• Cringe2793@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Something about Louis just strikes me as extremely untrustworthy. I’m not sure what it is, but it’s definitely there.

    • alldreadme@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      He might come off as edgy but honestly he’s one of the few people I trust online. Dude did amaizing stuff with right to repair stuff too.

    • PrivateNoob@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Louis explains the license in the video. You can fork it and modify it, but if you fill it up with ads, spyware, malware etc., they fill fuck you.

      • stifle867@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        You can not modify the source code.

        you are not entitled to use or do anything with the code for any commercial or other purpose, other than review, compilation and non-commercial distribution in accordance with the terms of this license.

        “review” means to access, analyse, test and otherwise review the code as a reference, for the sole purpose of analysing it for defects.

        • zolax@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          doesn’t it allow compilation and non-commercial distribution? I don’t agree with the license (not free or open source), but I’m genuinely curious on what specifically doesn’t allow source code modification.

          • stifle867@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            It does allow compilation and non-commercial distribution, as per the terms my comment above. If you’re curious as to what disallows source code modifications, that is also contained in the terms included in my comment above.

      • smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        That’s their goal. They have good intentions. But it also means no commercial use.

        You can’t do “Hey, can you add this feature to this app, I’ll pay you” or “Here is much improved version you can buy from me” or “We give you paid support and help for this software for your company”. Eventually all improvements bounce back to original creators anyway, see: vital paid Wordpress theme ecosystem, most of them being GPL licenced.

        With project getting bigger such restriction can be almost as bad as with propietary app. Like, imagine Linux kernel but only with Linus Torvalds having right to sell computers with it or offer any services making money.