Some of the LinkedIn Responses are direct and on-point, and also hilariously/depressingly based depending on how you look at it:

EDIT: In hindsight, I think I should’ve looked into posting this in a different community… It’s closer to a silly “innovation”… soo… is this considered FUD? I also don’t support smoking or vaping, especially among kids. Original title had “privacy-violating” before the “solution”.

  • exanime@lemmy.world
    89·
    2 months ago

    Considering they are only harming themselves, no I do not care much

    As others mentioned, I think schools should dedicate resources to address this situation through education, instead of paying some start up for some surveillance gadgets

    • oatscoop@midwest.social
      3·
      2 months ago

      Considering they are only harming themselves

      Again, we’re talking about actual children. You know: people that have yet to mentally develop to the point where they can make fully informed decisions on everything and sometimes have to be “coerced” by reasonable adults into doing so.

        • oatscoop@midwest.social
          2·
          2 months ago

          I didn’t disagree with that part. Doing what you suggested and using the “vape detectors” aren’t mutually exclusive.

          • exanime@lemmy.world
            2·
            2 months ago

            Doing what you suggested and using the “vape detectors” aren’t mutually exclusive.

            Well, kind of since I suggested NOT using vape detectors