Cheradenine@sh.itjust.works to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · edit-215 days agoRachael rulesh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square21fedilinkarrow-up1361arrow-down14
arrow-up1357arrow-down1imageRachael rulesh.itjust.worksCheradenine@sh.itjust.works to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · edit-215 days agomessage-square21fedilink
minus-squarerichieadler@lemmy.myserv.onelinkfedilinkarrow-up7·16 days agoAccording to Ridley Scott. P. K. Dick disagreed. 😁
minus-squareUndercoverUlrikHD@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down2·16 days agoI guess it depends on your reference yeah. In the movies he was a replicate
minus-squareJamesTBagg@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·15 days agoThat’s never explicitly stated in the movie. I believe it’s hinted at just enough to make you wonder. Which in turn makes you wonder what even makes a human person. In the sequel I think they pretty heavily lean on him being human.
minus-squareUndercoverUlrikHD@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-215 days agoBoth the director and actor have confirmed it though
According to Ridley Scott. P. K. Dick disagreed.
😁
I guess it depends on your reference yeah. In the movies he was a replicate
That’s never explicitly stated in the movie. I believe it’s hinted at just enough to make you wonder. Which in turn makes you wonder what even makes a human person. In the sequel I think they pretty heavily lean on him being human.
Both the director and actor have confirmed it though