• pHr34kY@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    As a GrapheneOS user, It would be nice if they made it available to their android platforms first.

    • foremanguy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      RCS is not the future it’s just a WhatsApp like app included inside the messages app. Google servers, closed source, centralized…

    • prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      7 days ago

      ALL my android buds (all 3 of them) would talk about RCS as the future, better than iMessage, proof that Apple is terrible for not having it and adding it.

      So anyways my iPhone has RCS now and none of their androids do. Shocker.

        • prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          Meaning they have to install another app.

          At which point they’d just as soon install signal and have something better.

          None of their phones come with a RCS enabled messaging app by default.

          My iPhone on iOS 18 does however. Which is my point entirely.

  • JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    8 days ago

    They should have used something like the Matrix or Signal protocol, some open standard, as opposed to RCS, which you can only use on Android with two proprietary apps - Google and Samsung Messages.

    • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      8 days ago

      RCS is the new MMS. It’s the official “text message” replacement.

      It’s shit and until the standard becomes not shit, messages between Android and iMessage are still going to suck. Almost all the stuff people think is RCS are the proprietary Google extensions that only work through Google’s servers.

      But they’re supporting it because it’s the next iteration of “texting” carrier wise.

    • Corngood@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      Yeah, I would love to stop getting potato quality videos on MMS, but not enough to install a proprietary app. I’ll just have to create matrix accounts for more people.

      • chiisana@lemmy.chiisana.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 days ago

        Not entirely true… the American Android users care about it; Apple users will still default to the superior iMessage as opposed to the inconsistent carrier dependant RCS; rest of the world will use geo-preferred third party messaging app that also offer consistent experience between carriers.

        “Buy your mom an iPhone” people.

      • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        They do in the US, and you’re getting downvoted because of US defaultism.

        But on a global scale, you’re right.

                • prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  7 days ago

                  my dude.

                  I have literally sat next to these people, just this past Saturday, and we were talking about just this BECAUSE our group chat for our game wasn’t “working” for us.

                  I know for an absolute certain fact that the three of them don’t have RCS, we all thought it was funny and moved on with our lives and switched to signal.

                  Idk why you’re so certain of something you’re otherwise totally ignorant to

            • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              7 days ago

              Well I just bring it up because part of RCS is encryption, but there are a lot of asterisks and one of them is that RCS with Apple will never be encrypted.

              It’s one of the main problems with RCS is that whether or not the chat is secure depends on the implementation and is dependent on sender and receiver, unlike iMessage where you know that when the chat bubbles are blue, your chat is encrypted.

              IMO inconsistent encryption is worse than no encryption at all, due to the false sense of security.

      • yoshisaur@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        8 days ago

        aww. does apple being forced to allow the newest messaging standard hurt you?

        • chiisana@lemmy.chiisana.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 days ago

          No, they’re mostly correct; basically no one except Android users in the USA cares. Everywhere else has it figured out with third party messaging platforms that’s geographically favored, and Apple users in USA will continue to use the superior iMessage protocol with each other. Only the Android users in USA are left out from sending/receiving messaging, so they’re salivating over the update like it’s the best thing since sliced bread.

          RCS is janky, inconsistent, and carrier dependent. Can’t wait for Android users in the USA to join the better rest of the world. Until GSM consortium mandates end to end encryption and force all carriers to adopt certain version of consistent minimum, RCS is and will continue to be a garbage inferior protocol that should be avoided like the plague.

        • BorgDrone@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          8 days ago

          Doesn’t matter either way because everyone uses WhatsApp anyway.

          RCS will never be able to compete with either because it’s a GSMA standard. Apple or Meta can think of a cool new feature, add it to their client and roll it out to all their users with the next update.

          If they want to add a new feature to RCS, the GSMA (An organization with over 1500 members) will have to form a committee, they can then talk about their conflicting interestes for a few years before writing down a new version of the standard, then dozens of clients and servers at hundreds of different operators need to be upgraded before everyone can use the new feature. Due to this bullshit RCS will never be able to keep up.

        • Noel_Skum@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 days ago

          Honestly, where I operate, almost nobody uses (outgoing) sms/mms - unless their phone has actual physical buttons on it. It’s all iMessage for those who can or something like Viber for those who can’t. I can’t see why anybody would take a step backwards to RCS when it offered nothing that we haven’t already been doing for years - and it’s apparently network dependant.

  • Gianni R@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    The fact that iPhones are getting this before Android phones without Google Play Services tells you all you need to know about the nature of RCS. Android has lost all of its intrigue and fun in favor of becoming GoogleOS