Arthur Besse@lemmy.ml to Technology@lemmy.mlEnglish · 2 months ago"participants who had access to an AI assistant wrote significantly less secure code" and "were also more likely to believe they wrote secure code" - 2023 Stanford University study published at CCS23arxiv.orgexternal-linkmessage-square38fedilinkarrow-up1365arrow-down17
arrow-up1358arrow-down1external-link"participants who had access to an AI assistant wrote significantly less secure code" and "were also more likely to believe they wrote secure code" - 2023 Stanford University study published at CCS23arxiv.orgArthur Besse@lemmy.ml to Technology@lemmy.mlEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square38fedilink
minus-squareSl00k@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 months agoThat’s definitely valid, but just because a tool is used for scam doesn’t inherently mean it’s a scam. I don’t call the cellphone a scam because most my calls are.
That’s definitely valid, but just because a tool is used for scam doesn’t inherently mean it’s a scam. I don’t call the cellphone a scam because most my calls are.