superkret@feddit.org to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 day agoThat explains it.feddit.orgimagemessage-square162fedilinkarrow-up11.38Karrow-down117
arrow-up11.36Karrow-down1imageThat explains it.feddit.orgsuperkret@feddit.org to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 day agomessage-square162fedilink
minus-squarenailingjello@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up138arrow-down1·1 day agoGuess I’m the only one who read her post and thought the wives were the ones following the young Women.
minus-squareKiwi_fella@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up33arrow-down1·20 hours agoThat’s a perfectly legitimate way to interpret the text, and might even be true.
minus-squaremodus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·12 hours agoYou’re not. But the author of the sentence is not necessarily a contender for Grammarian of the Year.
minus-squarecasmael@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up12arrow-down1·16 hours agoYeah it’s a poorly constructed sentence isn’t it
minus-squareinterdimensionalmeme@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up2·5 hours agoAmbiguïty increases memetic potential
Guess I’m the only one who read her post and thought the wives were the ones following the young Women.
That’s a perfectly legitimate way to interpret the text, and might even be true.
You’re not. But the author of the sentence is not necessarily a contender for Grammarian of the Year.
Yeah it’s a poorly constructed sentence isn’t it
Ambiguïty increases memetic potential
They mostly are.
Fellow dyslexic ٩( ☉ o⚆)