• Siegfried@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      In November 2023, the publisher of smash-hit videogame Genshin Impact obtained a DMCA subpoena hoping to identify who was behind the leak of unreleased artwork on Elon Musk’s X platform. X Corp. challenged the subpoena, citing the user’s anonymous speech rights under the First Amendment. In an order published this week, a district court judge denied X Corps’ motion to quash, in theory exposing the alleged leaker’s identity to Cognosphere.

      • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        citing the user’s anonymous speech rights under the First Amendment.

        Is there any validity to this theory?

        I never heard anonymity being protected by 1st AM

        • lath@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          2 months ago

          A quick skim says anonymity is protected under it, with exceptions. Mostly for criminal acts. Particularly here, if the leaked artwork falls under “intellectual property” then the exception applies and anonymity isn’t protected.

  • style99@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 months ago

    Back in the day, journalists went to prison to protect their sources. It was considered a rite of passage or a badge of honor. I highly doubt anyone at Twitter is willing to go to prison for their sources.

  • Dizzy Devil Ducky@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    As much as I dislike twatter, for once I agree with them as I’m a firm believer people should be able to leak things as minor as concept art or unused game art.

  • RubberDuck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    So are they now a publisher? It seems they want to have it both ways… you are either a platform provider and not responsible for the content… or you are. Want to protect people … be a publisher with everything that comes with that.