• warm@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 month ago

    A lot of shit games still sell millions on the back of marketing, so for a game to sell as little as concord, it had to be a whole new level of shit along with shitty marketing.

    • kurcatovium@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      That’s the thing. They sell it due to marketing. Concord had virtually no marketing whatsoever.

      So Sony came up with $40 game that failed to be as good and enjoying as mediocre f2p ones, supported it with zero marketing and expected profits somehow. Genius.

      • warm@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        A good game will sell itself though. How they spent 8 years on it, I don’t know.

        • kurcatovium@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Good game, yes. Concord was not one of those. It was mediocre, nothing special, definitely not a game people would pay 40 for.