I see it as a dangerous win ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

I was sure there was a reason, I just never worked in the field long enough to learn or ask why

Thanks 🫡

Or you work with gas cylinders.

I don’t understand this one, please Airgas

You fucker :(

Praise be Cortana and IE’s reinstallation!

Ain’t even gotta do that, just imagine he suffered for 500,000 years and he did, just like everyone and everything you ever knew was created last Thursday

Ha, tell that to my brain trying to recall what i learned in undergrad

!:'(!<

Yeah, not sure why folks care

I can sue discord and there’s nothing their EULA can do to stop me.

God bless our right to litigate*

*terms and conditions apply: enough money to win in a battle of attrition

Currently using blokada. Any reason to switch?

WE ARE EARTHICAN!

Yeah, nah, fuck water. I’m good

Samsung actually allows app cloning for multiple profiles without using secure folder.

I’m not sure if it’s a list of supported apps or any as I don’t use the feature

I work a shit ton of OT, but I get paid 1.5x or 2x based on circumstances for that extra time

I deliver the same quality of work on ST and OT—my best, but I would never work unpaid OT (e.g. some of my salaried engineers have been living at the job during our system upgrades) or do things well beyond the scope of my job.

Fuck that

The ambiguity doesn’t lie in they, it lies in the way the writer constructed that sentence, as the person you responded to already stated.

The writer (and the person they are communicating with) knows the plurality of the “who”, an outside observer (us, the readers) aren’t privy to that information. Clarification on the part of the writer would provide that context. But the sentence isn’t written to be read to a 3rd party, but the other party (the person the writer is communicating with).

99.99% of people understand this intuitively, but this is the way you’d parse the understanding of that sentence.

And if you’ll note, in my second sentence, “they” is understood to be singular—the writer.

E: and for Shits n’ giggles: if neither party (the writer nor the person being communicated to) knows the plurality of the “who” they are referring to, then it’s irrelevant information. They will discover who wrote it when they go searching.

And if you’ll note, in that previous sentence, it’s understood that I am using the plural they (the writer and the person being communicated to) in both uses of the last sentence.

Probably fear of cutting yourself with that single blade.

That’s what took me so long.

BTW, anyone here who face shaves regularly, switch to a safety razor. This is a threat.

Singular “They” is literally almost as old as the word “They” itself.

People have gotten by using it for almost 700 years.

Because they all fight over who’s hair is the broccoliest

I can’t. I need it in 7.62 NATO

The Bard has his own spell for that one ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)