What would be the misinformation? A typical working family in the 1970 could survive and feed their family. Today, a working family barely make enough money to pay for rent.

If CEO deserve their pay (hypothetically) then why would the employee not equally get higher salary increase?

Please explain how business have not, at least in the last 30 years, focused on gaining high profit for shareholders and care very little of the consumer or the workers.

A CEO goal is not to serve the board to the point of ripping a business apart. In that same breath, a Board should actually be held accountable to not pillage companies to simply increase their already big portfolio…

If this was true…Nd I wouldn’t be surprised that he would sya such a thing as… Making profit for the share holders. Is justified even if ruthlessly done…

I remember watching a documentary, it may have been Robert Reich that was explaining how businesses in the 1970’s made profits but the difference between the owner and the employee was high but still within a certain logic. Companies still had the philosophy that you should keep your employees for 30 years and treat them with a certain respect whereas today… A lot of big business are there for the shareholder and screw the employee. They are selfish anyway… Wanting more than minimal salary 🙄

Then again, I love reading Robert Reich… https://robertreich.substack.com/p/the-paid-what-youre-worth-myth

And yet another good article : https://robertreich.substack.com/p/if-bosses-are-raking-it-in-shouldnt

So your one experience represent all small business owners… Just wow

Thankfully you don’t paint with a broad brush 🙄

I would rather focus on billionaire and millionaire than CEO since both are not automatically interchangeable… .

You can be a CEO In a small business without being a millionaire of the same category as the one of United HealthCare

Yup so yet again they will make sure he grows up to be as greedy and selfish as he is…

The idea that strangers raise your kids 24/7…

I believe it was Robert Reich who spoke about the difference eif CEO in the 1970’s were profit margins where in the 30-40% versus to now where the goal is 100%…

Fair enough

Well I think the real question should be, why isn’t the democratic party being sued for preventing other political parties from presenting themselves…

The issue is that with a two party system it permits bit sides to take its population for granted… No real competition

What is sad is that such a child will grow up in that same culture and way of thinking …

This is the problem, such individuals will delight in pushing their agenda on kids…

I always refer to my professor of philosophy : George Carlin

https://youtu.be/2tp0UNcjzl8

Yea… That is what is the most funny. A CEO that knows how to play his cards could easily turn the system around and still have a profit… Like of 30% instead of 98%…

Agreed, murder is murder. Even if the guy is part of a system of monsters, it does not matter. He is still allowed to due process as part of the American judicial system.

Damnit, you just made him important 😜

Agreed, I think that he should have said nothing or perhaps bring out the point that beyond how people may or may not feel we should not aim to live In a society that privilege vigilante that take justice in there hand as it can quickly slip into a very bad place… I see people suggesting a purge… I would recommend those people go out and meet some of the victims of the Rwandan genocide and see how they feel with there so called brave words…

It’s easy to spout such things using social media because we are anonymous but we do not want such violence to reproduce itself… This is how collateral damage happens. In Montreal an 11 year old child died because of a car bomb that was set by the Rock Machines as retaliation against the Hells Angel’s… No one won that day, we only lost a fraction of our soul as a society when we had to bury a child.

This is the problem, this time someone did a clean shot, what if the killer choses bombs and causes collateral damage. Will any of you sacrifice your children for this so called justice?

It shows how little they actually put effort in character building…

How can you declare that Snot or Snort or whatever his name is the master of an important character and then boom he’s dead…

It was so pointless…

Obi wan kenobi death was purposeful as you see he became stronger in death…

Stork… Or wait was it snork? Anyway that character didn’t even need to be in the movie…

😂

Hmm yes with the Yakuza leader being killed I believe?

Now let’s add a bit of Ghost in the Shell where the shooter is invisible because no one has organic eyes anymore… And he has an electronic scrambling technology

Pfff I was wondering whne the mug will explode or crumble in the person’s hands…

Whitney Houston had cocaine problems I believe…