Ahh, reminds me of the gym membership I’d started just a few weeks ago. Small town thing, I knew the owner by name, yet they used an online service that required every little detail of your personal life to sign up, like why use such a thing? I asked him that, and its just because it’s convenient for his small-scale company to use.

Turns out, it didn’t actually care if your info was right, save for a card to charge. Put in some random driver’s license number and guerilla mail email, just sucks I didn’t have a knockoff phone number.

It really makes you wonder, why need all that? I know the answer, I just wish I could see it with my own two eyes, what all data brokers do dealings for that info.

Provided compliance is nuts, this man is a nutcase for complying. Sounds all good, but I dont believe being a nutcase warrants doxxing, verbal harassment, verbal threatening, and everything else that we’re seeing here.

So, I wanna support the Onion network, but it seems hosting a middle node is the most likely way, and thus have the largest base. In looking into it, exit nodes seem very dangerous to those who’re uneducated on the risks of having them, and thus are a big bottleneck.

Not to say this is a bad problem to have, as it’s a growing pain and that indicates an increase in popularity, but wouldn’t wide-scale adoption of this disproportionately limit the usability of the Onion network through the exit nodes?

I was gonna say, much as I wanna do work from home myself, I’d say the whole gestures broadly at everything economic during COVID definitely has a bit more of an impact on company profits during that time period.

Real quick, does anyone want this? It’s another competitor in a rather centralized market, so it’s good we’re seeing some adequate competition, but the product they’re pushing is designed specifically for “AI and cloud workloads”. Their marketing towards datacenters seems to indicate the AI focus, but at the expense of performance to non-AI applications. In a nutshell, I do believe it’ll excel with AI, but “Cloud workflows” sounds like marketing lingo for “Lol this CPU can’t handle heavy tasks.”

Yeah, it’s all speculation from me here, but if manufacturers are pressured to drop AMD for Nvidia’s CPUs, this seriously looks like the first significant push to a standard where your computer only exists to access a server, where you don’t own your own services.

As far as my applications for open-sourcing goes, AI has actually done a good number on assisting it.

I’m a DIY sort of person, and use a lot of software for things like ESP32 boards to complete niche tasks. The problem is that very many applications just didn’t have some preexisting code made for it, so it took a much larger load for me to try programming it by hand. In recent years, I’ve had a much easier time finding software for things, and sure enough, many of these projects have some mention or disclaimer about AI.

I know AI brings its own problems with it, namely that of code produced with lesser-optimized techniques, but the alternative I had to deal with was simply no premade code at all.

That being said, many of these projects did die out after AI was implemented, but not because the community was less interested, or the developers were less caring. These projects died because they reached their end goal, they did exactly what you needed it to do, no more or less. Far as I’m aware, that sounds like a successful outcome.