• 0 Posts
  • 383 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: September 7th, 2023

help-circle
  • Sissy in particular likely stems from the social taboo of not performing to your gender’s role, it’s just a form of humiliation kink. Might be more common in closeted/egg transfems because it’s a somewhat safer way of being feminine in a context, it just happens to be sexual.

    And crossdressing is a super wide term anyway but in a sexual context I’d think it’s just roleplay


  • A lot of the individuals aren’t in there entirely of their own will though. Particularly with BYU, the institution itself is a cancer, but the individual students are really not at fault (at least certainly not all of them). The university portrays itself very differently than it actually is, and you effectively cannot leave the mormon church while you attend (unless you want to get kicked out and have all your time there completely wasted).


  • I would heavily disagree on LLMs being obviously sentient. I don’t see how they could be, as I see it it would require an understanding of the words they put out in a framework that isn’t language - but language is the only framework they can possibly have. All words LLMs know are defined only through their relation to other words.

    It’s also a matter of defining what self-awareness even is, and I don’t have the hubris to say that LLMs for sure are not sentient, it just seems very unlikely from my perspective. I would also argue that monkeys are most likely sapient, though the whole concept has always reeked of “oh shit sentience doesn’t make us special, quick think of something else”. I’d probably put LLMs somewhere on the level of individualistic insects at best.

    I still agree with your general sentiment that people are far too dismissive of the topic in general given our history in doing this with animals. Esp the concept of pain is an interesting one, because essentially pain is just negative reinforcement, which of course is part of reinforcement learning. But pain also had to naturally evolve and is very flawed as a result, while the negative reinforcement is just a number without side effects, so it likely wouldn’t ever feel like pain the same way it feels for an animal. But the difference is often philosophical, and we define things the way they are convenient.












  • LwL@lemmy.worldtome_irl@lemmy.worldme_irl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    It’s just still a spelling bee. They’ll find some fitting term to call it and that’s that. Everyone knows the show is set in a different country anyways. The concept is intuitive enough, even if it’d be very easy in most languages.





  • LwL@lemmy.worldtome_irl@lemmy.worldMe_irl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    4500 a month for housing is insane, is rent actually that bad in the US? I could rent a villa for that.

    You are also missing private retirement funds though (and if car dependent 100/month seems very low for transit costs)


  • It’s the equivalent of grooming. So yes, it is morally questionable. But so is every “training someone to do a thing”. People just accept it with animals as long as in the end the animal seems fine, because it’s only ever about what seems normal and not about the actual impact. And I’m not saying it’s all a horrible moral crime, just that it’s a large grayscale and can’t be painted as good or bad blankly.

    Doing that to random wild animals for no reason does feel rather fucked up to me because until the end point (which in that case is likely just the realization that there’s no danger) it puts the animal under a lot of stress. Not to mention the potential issues with wild animals losing their fear of humans.