And that they lost both wars against the USSR.
- 0 Posts
- 102 Comments
Mt Rushmore is also comically evil. It is a holy site of the natives. The local inhabitants got exterminated/ethnically cleansed after the US government set prices for their skalps. Then they approved to creation of that monument, done by a KKK member. And the icing on the shitfest: The entire area was designated a national park, to keep it save from any return claim by the natives.
Why should I waste my time writing a subhuman slave trader right?
The dude who made the falg, Gadsen, was a slave trader.
The notion is “I don’t want to pay taxes. But I have no problem with selling human beings.”
It is not really the opposite, the “don’t tread on me”-pissflag is from a slave trader, the US cops originate from slave catchers.
REEEEvolution@lemmygrad.mlto Memes@lemmygrad.ml•Today, 80 years ago, this absolute hero killed Hitler5·2 months agoHe also killed the dude who killed Hitler. That was kinda cringe.
REEEEvolution@lemmygrad.mlto Memes@lemmygrad.ml•Ayn Rand defending “civilized” Israel over the “savage” Arabs4·3 months agoTbf, no one could have forseen how much of a piece of shit she would become. Even her sister was suprised.
“totalitarianism” is a term used to equate nazism with socialism, ergo soft genocide denial.
Tbf, that pic is from before the first round of trump. The creator is even worse now.
In short: To be considered not poor in China you have to have full access to healthcare, edcuation a relatively decent income, solid housing and so on.
They did not “pat thremselves on the back” for givcing them the “possibility” of making above 1,90 bucks a day.
What you described is ABSOLUTE poverty(not the possibility of making that money, but actually doing so is the definition. Just the possibility would be considered a failure by chinese standards), the form of poverty(also called relative poverty) which China has fully eradicated not too long ago. China defines relative poverty much more broadly.
Then They’d have done no pushups in the last 6 years and thus had atrophied muscles.
Considering he was a anti-communist snitch. Makes sense.
Emus got him.
REEEEvolution@lemmygrad.mlto Memes@lemmygrad.ml•“How dare you make a painting based off of our massacres, we’re banning this crayon now!”1·3 months agoOnly took 70 years.
Way to ignore the noble Emu.
REEEEvolution@lemmygrad.mlto Memes@lemmygrad.ml•The British talking about Russia and Ukraine15·4 months agoEurope also has insanely draconic laws ragarding unanounced demonstrations.
REEEEvolution@lemmygrad.mlto Memes@lemmy.ml•"Violence is never the answer" unless it is white people doing it12·4 months agoWell, you deserve an answer regarding your economic question for the way. Russias economy is doing pretty well, its government used the time from 2014 onwards to create alternatives to western markets. For example gas and oil go to India(who resells some to the EU) and China now. And the US who, of course, does not comply with the sanctions. Another factor of Russias resilience to western sanctions is the historical fact that the west sanctions non-western countries all the time. This created a situation in which most of the world is under western sanctions of varous kinds, the sanctioned countries are less inclined to follow western dictates regarding Russia. So Russia still can trade with most of the world.
Meanwhile Europe did expect to get cheap gas as always no matter how much it antagonized Russia. Unfortunately for them, Russia did not renew the delivery contract it had with the EU countries(which would guarantee delivery for a pre-settled price). Leading to the EU having to buy Russian gas on the spot market (highly variable prices). Some EU countries did not antagonize Russia as much, and thus had their contract renewed, thney got fucked another way by big daddy Washington. With the US blowing up Northstream 2 and Ukraine stopping transit over its territory, the EU is physically cut off from Russian gas and and has to find alternatives fast.
One adress was Qatar, who can not cover the demand. Another was the US, who can but wants multiple times what Russia demanded. Furthermore, in either case the delivery would happen in liquified form. Which is ecologically problematic to say the least.
Liquidification requires lots of energie and produces a shitload of CO2 emissions. Driving it over by special ships (of which not enough exist) again pumps lots of CO2 out and poisons the oceans because the large ship machines are using the absolute worst for fuel. That stuff then has to get on land, sufficient terminals only existed in Spain, in Germany they had to be built ignoring safety standards, because they were needed asap. The US gas is extracted from shale, as a side effect of shale oil extraction. This process poisons the land and water, leading to tab water being flamable in many parts of the US.
Overall this means rising energy costs in the west, which means less favourable conditions of energy intensive companies. The US solves that way by pulling all restrictions regarding shale oil extraction, digging up Alaska and so on and providing tax incentives for companies moving to the US - in short: They loot their vassal states in Europe.
Europe is fucked. Which, of course, leads to tensions within NATO. Especially as the US wants the euros to shoulder the cost of their occupation now, too. Teh EU countries have already been weakened by austerity and neoliberal politics, now have to pump billions into their militaries. Said money is created via debt on one side, via further cuts on social services on the other, creating internal tensions. Said tensions can be observed by the rise of the far right in every EU country.
Another reason for inter NATO and EU tensions is the fact that the countries in the Eu who did not antagonize Russia, now also are fucked. Because the US and it’s ukranian dog blocked direct pipelines.
So put together the situation, the EU got fucked by the US and its own stupidity, Ukraine got fucked by NATO, EU, US and its own stupidity, Russia got away cleanly, the US got away cleanly at the cost of its imperial periphery. Climate Change won big. Humanity lost big.
“To be an enemy of the United States is risky, to be an ally is fatal.”
So you love slavery. Good start.
India dicked around, China put them to their place and the war ended in extremely amicable terms.
There was one (1), so no “wars”(plural), a war(singular). It was a limited border conflict because Vietnam and the PRC ended on different sides of the the Sino-Soviet split.
They happened before the timframe covered by the picture. Tibet happend under Mao, as did the Sino-Indian one. The war against Vietnam happened under Deng. The timeframe covered by the pic is post-Deng. Since then the PRC did, factually, not wage any war.