What about staying at 0? Why is debt better than no debt AND no surplus?

To add to this. The sensory experience of showers is a lot.

1. being comfortable in your warm clothes
2. having to take them off to get cold
3. having to get wet and warm
4. having to dry yourself with a rough (ish) towel
5. Getting cold again
6. Damp air makes it harder to breathe
7. Putting on different clothes which potentially feels different from the used ones
8. Getting out of the bathroom to non-humid air
9. Coldness of the remaining water (hair etc) evaporating

I also have sound sensitivities, so the sound of water hitting the floor is also disturbing.

Blåhaj here I come!

I asked in a similar thread a while ago and the answer is no, you have to type them each out and as for importing you need to go into each user to block.

What’s stopping someone from creating a new one. The devs? “Please select a username for your account” when creating your first character. After that you cannot change it, and is linked to all your characters. If you get reported, the report would include the account name = unique “John1836q83” getting banned.

This enforces band the same way as PSN linked email would do, but is all ingame and accessible to 100% of players that own the game.

If it is a simple popup that has 0 implications and is only visible when reporting, no one would care, and definitely not enough to boycott the entire game.

They obviously want to force psn account for other reasons.

Good read. Thanks. Will bookmark this for sure!

I like the idea of the multiple choice. I’ll do that for my next campaign

I don’t even own the game. Im just saying, if their argument is unique identifiers, there are more ways than a third party solution. It’s not like they don’t have options. They chose this over any other solution. If they did a unique identifier ingame, no one would complain. So the reason they chose this is something else then being the only solution.

Why can’t they make a unique username when you create a character the first time that is just your “account name”? That would give you the samw powers as a psn username when it comes to banning. Edit:spelling

While I don’t want to support weapons, blaming people that bought the vr headset in the past for what he would do with the money after the sale is a very bad take. You can’t blame them for not knowing the future.

Also the argument itself doesn’t make much sense and can be strawmaned to “you pay taxes, therefore you are a complicit in the murders of your military, therefore you are a bad person”.

Haha, nice. I had to go back to read his post twice to see what you were talking about.

No, because there are error bars on “things”, and “everyone”, and “knows”, and on “by the time they are 30”.

This means that statistically, following a Bell curve on where people land based on this, there will be some that will be much older, and much younger that have heard of a specific thing to the point of “knowing” it.