- 0 Posts
- 59 Comments
1·2 months agoRemoved by mod
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
2·2 months agoJoins the cinematic “hardest to trademark” pantheon alongside “She”, “Her”, and “Them”
1·2 months agoDoing what? Fighting a war they didn’t start?
No ethnographic studies have shown that any present or past society has used barter without any other medium of exchange or measurement, and anthropologists have found no evidence that money emerged from barter.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barter
What would be an example of the barter economy you’re certain exists? How do they overcome the need for double coincidence?
There is a large difference between war and genocide.
But that’s what I’m asking you. Can one side achieve overwhelming victory, in your view, without you calling it a “genocide”?
No, right?
5·2 months agoReading the error message wins again
Does war exist, in your view? Or is it always a case of the winner murdering the loser, unjustifiably?
This is literally the first post where you’ve understood what question I even fucking asked, I think you’re obligated to give one attempt at an answer before you take your third place victory lap
I continue to recommend that you read the paper past the abstract, hope that helps
Why would anyone care about “tremors”?
I am serious, and don’t call me Shirley
No you asked why hadn’t they raised prices before.
Sorry, you’ve misunderstood the question. Obviously there have been price increases in the past.
If a company, on this present date, raises the price of a widget they sell to $X.XX, I’m asking you why it wasn’t already at that price. Why had they waited?
If the paper says something the abstract doesn’t then it’s a bad paper or a bad abstract.
The whole point of an abstract is that it’s not the entire paper, stupid
Removed by mod