![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/0d5e3a0e-e79d-4062-a7bc-ccc1e7baacf1.png)
It’s not paranoia if they really are trying to kill scam you.
IMHO you probably now have the right amount of scepticism.
It’s not paranoia if they really are trying to kill scam you.
IMHO you probably now have the right amount of scepticism.
Banks’ system are probably already compromised and don’t even know it.
I haven’t wanted an Intel processor for years. Their “innovation” is driven by marketing rather than technical prowess.
The latest batch of 13900k and again with 14900k power envelope microcode bullshit was the final “last” straw.
They were more interested in something they could brand as a competitor to ryzen. Then left everyone who bought one (and I bought three at work) holding the bag.
We’ve not made the same mistake again.
Intel dying and its corpse being consumed by its competitors is a fairy tale ending.
Thinking about it, the SoC idea could stop at the southern boundary of the chipset in x86 systems.
Include DDR memory controller, PCI controller, USB controllers, iGPU’s etc. most of those have migrated into x86 CPU’s now anyway (I remember having north and south bridge chipsets!)
Leave the rest of the system: NIC’s, dGPU’s, etc on the relevant busses.
The films were as perfectly cast as possible, and the elves were portrayed perfectly too. You definitely got the feeling that they all were immortal, ancient, and dripping with the arrogance and composure that would bring.
NVIDIA spent many many years doing a very very poor job of providing drivers for Linux.
Many people have not forgiven them for that.
I was there, Mr Anderson, 3000 years ago…
ARM won the mobile/tablet form factor right from the start. Apple popularised ARM on the desktop. Amazon popularised ARM in the cloud.
Intel’s been busy shitting out crap like the 13900K/14900K and pretending that ARM and RISC-V aren’t going to eat their lunch.
The only beef I have with ARM systems is the typical SoC formula, I still want to build systems from off the shelf components.
I can’t wait.
Backup backup backup! If you have btrfs them just take a snapshot first: instantly.
One could do a non-destructive rename first. E.g. prepend deleteme.
to the file name, sanity check it, then ‘rollback’ by renaming back without the prefix or commit and delete anything with the prefix.
Depends on the jurisdiction. Some states recognise “nuncupative” and “holographic” wills.
Other jurisdictions recognise any “speech” that details disposal of assets upon death as a will.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Messier_87
Freaking enormous galaxy. Is unusual in almost every way.
There’s no consideration specified, so it’s not really a contract in normal terms.
It is however a last will and testament for disposal of his asset(s).
Among my favourite takes on the Culture is, I think, from Consider Phlebas: that the Minds basically keep humanity as pets, and everyone is just fine with that thank you very much.
ln
creates a hard link, ln -s
creates a symlink.
So, yes, the hardlink tool effectively replaces a file’s duplicates with hard links automatically, as if you’d used ln
manually.
For backup or for file-level reduplication?
If the latter, how?
I have exactly the same problem.
I got as far as using fdupe
to identify duplicates and delete the extras. It was slow.
Thinking about some of the other comments… If you use a tool to create hardlinks first, then one could then traverse the entire tree and deleting a file if it has more than one hardlink. The two phases could be done piecemeal and are cancelable and restartable.
Astrophysics! And it’s part of the New Horizons mission team.
El Reg pulls no punches.
Well. To Java that’s just a string of utf-8 characters, assuming you haven’t bastardised the encoding, and it’s just yanked out of an HTTP entity. So of course they’re different.
If you’re using some json parser and object mapping library (like Jackson) then all bets are off 'cause it could be configured any which way.
On every other language and library it’s whatever the defined behaviour is.
3/10