- 0 Posts
- 262 Comments
now imagine this same scenario where you have a choice between driving your truck vs. public transit or bicycle infrastructure. Sure you may not use it but others may no longer be required to own a car and drive it for such short distances in the first place.
the net difference of owning a car vs not needing one and hence not owning it goes beyond just monetary gains.
The argument is not one based on changing behavior at an individual level. Its about policy and urban design.
how much do you spend on fuel commuting to the city? that 1M in the city is buying you a lot more than the 600 sq ft.
from your 420k suburban home, what’s the average distances to your: doctor, groceries, place of worship or study or work?
Do you own a car? Whats the median distance of commutes in a typical year for you?
We also shouldn’t forget time cost of your commutes. Median time spent commuting in a year you could have spent doing other things.
Sure i agree with you that suburb is better if you have public transit connecting you to the city from your home in the suburbs and you use it regularly.
eskimofry@lemmy.worldtoMicroblog Memes@lemmy.world•AI bro discovering imaginationEnglish3·2 months agoAs a person who CAN imagine and hear my mind speak… I can’t imagine that.
eskimofry@lemmy.worldto Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world•Bring out the trumpets and pour out the beer1·2 months agothe liberals need to understand that too and stop being fascists.
eskimofry@lemmy.worldto Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world•Bring out the trumpets and pour out the beer12·2 months ago“not forced to use them”
This ignores obnoxious hurdles in place to make the free tier as shitty as possible so people buy.
“cover your own ass for mistakes” Well can you personally guarantee that these asshats won’t create traps and gotcha’s along the way?
eskimofry@lemmy.worldto Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world•Which job(s) would you refuse to accept regardless of how good the pay is?17·2 months agoAs a Software Engineer my list is only slightly longer and has these additional companies:
Oracle
Microsoft
Google
eskimofry@lemmy.worldto Uplifting News@lemmy.world•Butter made from carbon tastes like the real thing, gets backing from Bill GatesEnglish1·2 months agoI don’t think you understand that not all creatures are tortured.
eskimofry@lemmy.worldto Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world•Imagine you have infinite dollars backing you. What's the thing you'd want to pursue just because it's something you'd like to do with your life?4·2 months agoyeah where’s that bullionaire/oligarch/CEO list?
eskimofry@lemmy.worldto Technology@lemmy.world•Microsoft no longer permits local Windows 10 accounts if you want Consumer Extended Security Updates — support beyond EOL requires a Microsoft Account link-up even if you pay $30English27·2 months agoMicrosoft is no longer permitted on my PC
eskimofry@lemmy.worldto Comic Strips@lemmy.world•Cutting Out the Middleman (by Jen Sorensen)2·2 months agoThis post and several comments agreeing with this I feel are made with some level of ignorance on “Civil Disobedience”.
Minimizing participation in the orphan-crushing machine but also debating politics on available platforms are not antithetical. Debating online is as important as doing the rest of the things that are perceived as “real” worthwhile pursuits. For instance: How can we pursue a cure for cancer if the political climate ensures scientists are scorned and distrusted? If evangelising about the “real” problems you care about is labelled as politics then can you really make progress without “political” action such as boycotting, protests and civil disobedience?
In the same vein, doing the small things in protest is the stepping stones to doing bigger things. It works the same way for any pursuit. Why shouldn’t I practice discipline with my disdain for all the evil in small ways while also pushing for more?
Jeff Bezos makes billions of dollars, But He didn’t get the $100 from me this year. Sure that sounds like a waste of time and energy for not much impact. But It didn’t cause me any hardship. But believe me that $100 had either a compounding effect on my own wealth this year or to some people i gifted essential food to. That impact was felt a lot more by me or one of the people i gifted food or essentials to.
eskimofry@lemmy.worldto Comic Strips@lemmy.world•Cutting Out the Middleman (by Jen Sorensen)1·2 months agoJust, please, stop with idiotic replies accusing people to be enslaved in the system because it’s an insult to anyone who is currently looking for a solution for cancer, saving lives as a firefighter, building houses where people will live, growing crops, and even keeping up internet so people can praise the revolution against the machine from their bedrooms.
First of all, I didn’t accuse anybody of anything here except try to push back against what I percieved as a comment that is disapproving of debate:
Ping me when you changed the world with whatever you are actually doing behind that keyboard 👋
Secondly, Minimizing participation in the orphan-crushing machine but also debating politics on available platforms are not antithetical. Debating online is as important as doing the rest of the things you say are “real” worthwhile pursuits. For instance: How can we pursue a cure for cancer if the political climate ensures scientists are scorned and distrusted? If evangelising about the “real” problems you care about is labelled as politics then can you really make progress without “political” action such as debating?
In the same vein, doing the small things in protest is the stepping stones to doing bigger things. It works the same way for any pursuit. Why shouldn’t I practice discipline with my disdain for all the small evil while also pushing for more?
Edit: Add the quote that i felt was misunderstanding why we need to protest in our own small ways.
Edit2: I think we are in agreement. I misread the thread. My comment is actually a refutation of the main post.
eskimofry@lemmy.worldto Comic Strips@lemmy.world•Cutting Out the Middleman (by Jen Sorensen)2·2 months agoIt’s so hard for people to agree that we should be doing something. Instead you argue that you are not going to do anything just out of spite all because OP personally may not be doing anything but their words are a bit preachy. If OP was a hypocrite but they still said the right thing why would you deliberately disagree? What would motivate you to act?
eskimofry@lemmy.worldto Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world•Too bad we can't have good public transportation6·3 months agothe “Socialism” is in quotes as were aren’t really talking about actual socialism. Its now a boogeyman dogwhistle used by rich people to steal public property and convert it into private capital.
eskimofry@lemmy.worldto memes@lemmy.world•Once I said to my therapist "I'm sure you hear this kind of thing all the time", and she said "No, this is like top 5".5·3 months agoliterature is boring, hearing crazy stories is more interesting ^That’s a joke please don’t downvote me too much^
Being forced to do these things seems childish
eskimofry@lemmy.worldto Technology@lemmy.world•Delta moves toward eliminating set prices in favor of AI that determines how much you personally will pay for a ticketEnglish31·3 months agothats a dishonest argument. One has a money assembly line straight to a billionaire’s house. The other’s assembly line that has a possibility to be used for public good.
eskimofry@lemmy.worldto Technology@lemmy.world•YouTube's Latest Update Shows That Online Monoculture Is DeadEnglish2·3 months agoit may not seem like it but… being offline is the best thing you can do to your mental health. No need to overwhelm your brain with stuff happening elsewhere when you already have to deal with stuff closer to home. Being aware is generally better than being ignorant but it shouldn’t disable your daily life.
eskimofry@lemmy.worldto Technology@lemmy.world•YouTube's Latest Update Shows That Online Monoculture Is DeadEnglish8·3 months agoits a paid platform where engagement (i.e bickering in the comments section) is near absent. And the content is allowed to address themes that make main stream media blush.
problem is, you need the underdog to actually fail at least once