Yeah, I also can’t stand it when words are used to convey meanings they’ve had for roughly five hundred years.
Fucking gross, you ghoul.
That makes assumptions, like that they would have had all the ingredients available or that they would eat enough subs to make buying the ingredients more viable.
Well that’s certainly a take!
Sure, let me help you! My point is that if you’re patronizing a restaurant that underpays wait staff and refuse to tip the server, you’re not only fucking them but you’re supporting the system by going to the restaurant in the first place.
That isn’t where “tip” comes from.
And you don’t have to subsidize them. Just don’t give those restaurants your patronage. The owners are the problem, right? Don’t support them!
About that, though: yeah they are.
A dull knife like you won’t cut anyone.
If you’re patronizing a restaurant that underpays wait staff and refuse to tip the server, you’re not only fucking them but you’re supporting the system by going to the restaurant in the first place.
Living up to the middle of your username, I see.
that’s a sticky question,
No, the banshee-wailing fuck it isn’t!
If someone truly believes they are in fucking danger, they need to remove themselves from the danger first and foremost, before any consideration of “but what about next election?”
O, to be so proverbially blissful.
I didn’t even realize it didn’t say “boner” until you pointed it out.
I almost feel like I’m being contrarian by asking this, though it isn’t my intent: your alternatives sound great at first blush, but how do you intend that those alternatives are enforced? Does that lead into your estimated >1% of offenders?
Is anyone else bothered that there are two number ones and one number two represented?
I don’t think water hammer would apply because there’s no abrupt cutoff or change in direction of the flow.
Keith David