Mac

Pretty sure they just mean that it can get stinky in there

It’ll do older with a TPM port and module fwiw. Ran it like this on 7th gen Intel X99

A joint in Spring just got a Michelin star!

I approve of Lemmy being God. My mom has a couple great stories playing cards and smoking joints with them while they had the groupies come in and out lol.

I really wish Kingston made their latest datatraveler drive in all-metal. The USB C one seems to just be an Nvme drive with a USB C port.

Well my instance’s logs are sent to null for this reason already, but thank you for the info!

As someone who hosts an instance, news to me lol

Edit: Developer says this can’t be done currently? Reddit comment

My personal favorite fan theory

That’s fair, but I learned the term from a bi girl so makes sense

Straight Pillow Princesses exist lol

Well really that’s where I’d say it’s up to you, the quasi real cockpit would not be worth it but most “entry level” sit down rigs and a wheel cost about $4-500 all in

I guess my point is what happens when they genuinely just want to exist for a year and nothing else. I get this is not a realistic question. Just curious of the outcome there

Genuine question, what happens when the populace loses motivation to contribute? Such as the “lie down” movement (yes I understand China is not the best example).

It’s killer app to me is sim racing but it requires too much additional investment

Already on the H100 bud

I get it, yes. Just ironic

You did all that and the link you use as proof doesn’t have Japan or Korea included? Lol

deleted by creator

Because the only reason people need licensed media are for official projects, whereas those looking for foss/oss code want it specifically for that reason. People still actively look for those licenses when needed, but someone throwing up a photoshopped picture on Facebook doesn’t give a damn what license it has.

If code was shared in more open places (like forums of old) it wouldn’t have a license either even though it is technically foss until stated otherwise. That last bit is the gotcha and reason why those looking to legally cover their ass seek out these licenses for commercial/educational purposes but only care about open source software personally due to the hope it’s easier to find exploits in the code (or any other reason).

I’m not sure I understand what your question is then. Open source pictures are practically the same thing as Creative Commons. The thing is “open source” means the source is open. Why would you need the source for a picture opened if you’re already freely distributing it? People add licenses to things like code so later people can build upon or take parts of in an orderly way. But if you just wanna share your photo to the world online, you will.

FOSS code explicitly states what it is to not be a nuisance to the creator getting requests to fork/modify accordingly. Most people just rip a picture off the internet and use it. Unless it’s for educational/business purposes where they just want a license as a CYA for them.