• 253 Posts
  • 89 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
Cake day: July 19th, 2023
  • ooli@lemmy.worldtomovies@lemm.ee•[Meme] Which movie was this for you?English
    3·
    6 days ago

    I watched it at release time. And the scene where Kevin Kostner run through his boat activating various sail and gadget to escape the bad guy is still engraved in my memory as the most badass thing ever. Was obsessed about the revelation of him having gills too.

    All that because it was heavily inspired of one of my favorite Sci-fi series: The Pandora Sequence by F. Herbert (where the 2 last book are on a water planet, where human evolved for this world)

    NB: the second book in the series was the source material for a more successful movie “Avatar” by Cameron. In the “Jesus incident” the planet is hostile to human, and there is a magical plant controlling it named “avata”… just to name a few similarity … they are endless

  • ooli@lemmy.worldtoAsk Lemmy@lemmy.world•Hey Lemmy, what's a movie you think everybody should see at least once?
    153·
    20 days ago

    For the few people who didn’t already watch it, and the best movie of all time :

    Mad Max: Fury road (2015 ) by Miller .

    This is what film story telling is about: having an entire weird universe told through visual medium. The 1st half hour has mad max gagged and incapable of talking, and it is amazing. Preferably on big screen.

    A gem from the past:

    Taboo(1999), by Nagisa Ôshima,

    a samurai movie with hint of homosexuality. and an ending that can only be understood by paying close attention to the sound off screen.

    A classic:

    Seven samurai(1954), Kurosawa.

    Just enjoy the black and white shot , and immerse in old Japanese culture

  • ooli@lemmy.worldtoMovies@lemmy.world•Alien RomulusEnglish
    52·
    30 days ago

    It is an okay movie, with some flaws. Rain surge to ultra competence out of nowhere being indeed the most outrageous.

    Here is my few thousand words theory about the movie:

    spoiler

    In the film “Alien: Romulus,” the title purports (as in “Prometheus”) to reference the name of the ship. Yet, akin to “Prometheus”, it is a ruse. The film alludes to the tale of the two brothers from antiquity, Romulus and Remus. Let us recall this story, penned in 800 BC, which itself inspired the myth of Abel and Cain (with its earliest written traces dating back to 400 BC):

    Romulus founds the city of Rome by plowing a furrow to mark the location of the new city’s walls. According to Roman legend (which favors Romulus, the founder of the capital), Remus mocks his brother and challenges him by leaping over the furrow. What might begin as an innocent jest between two brothers turns tragic: Romulus slays his brother Remus for this act. Romulus justifies his deed by declaring that no one shall ever breach the ramparts of Rome.

    It is evident that Romulus is not the hero the Romans would have us believe. He is the killer, the villain, the Cain of the Jewish narrative.

    In the film, which is a precise reiteration of Ridley Scott’s original “Alien,” it is more expedient to identify the differences between the two films than to find their similarities. There exists but a single distinction between them: there are two siblings.

    Rain and her brother Andy.

    Kay and her brother Tyler.

    In the first “Alien” of 1979, the crew shares no familial ties. However, as in “Romulus,” they approach a vessel that has emitted a distress signal. They must explore this ship. The diverse crew (a mix of male and female, Spanish and English) does not get along. They must encounter the aliens. A facehugger attacks a crew member. A chestburster escapes from a human body. The heroine is clad in scant attire to emphasize her vulnerability in her struggle against the primary alien. An alien is ejected into space as the heroine screams, “Take that, you son of a bitch.” For, as in “Alien,” the heroine is a woman, and the sole survivor, while the men exhibit toxic masculinity and meet their demise.

    Of course, the most significant commonality (and the key to the film’s true message) is the android Andy. While Rain is presented as the main character, there is no doubt that the true hero of the film is Andy. Rain has no reason to be so effective against the aliens. How can she conceive of utilizing the ship’s gravity when she is a “space virgin”? How does she wield a weapon when, unlike Tyler, she has never shown a passion for combat? How is she so resolute when the film’s beginning portrays her as ineffectual (to the extent that others assure her she will not have to leave the ship)?

    Certainly, Rain is the heroine, for Ripley (Sigourney Weaver) was in the original “Alien.” Yet Ripley was a pilot, and the rest of the crew admired her worth at the film’s outset. Thus, when she acts with such determination, it does not come as a surprise, as it does with Rain. Andy, on the other hand, though initially depicted as weak, becomes competent with a mere change of programming. This is why the android in the film appears more credible than the suddenly indestructible Rain, who lacks explanation for her transformation.

    The issue with Andy lies in his name. In the four preceding films of the series, the androids are named in alphabetical order: In the first film, “Alien,” the android is called Ash. In the second film, he is named Bishop. In the next, it is Call. In the previous film, “Prometheus,” he is called David (which presents another problem). Therefore, Andy should have a name beginning with an E, as he appears here in the fifth film of the series. In the film, Rook, the other android, refers to Andy by his construction designation N.D. Does the android’s name begin with an N? Is the film meant to be the 14th in the series? Unlikely. No! Andy begins with an “A” because he is the twin brother of Ash, the first android in the series.

    Returning to the legend of Romulus and Remus, as in the legend, Andy kills a sister, Kay, by refusing to open the door for her to escape the alien. Similarly, Rain kills a brother, Tyler, when he rushes toward her and is struck from behind by the alien’s prehensile tail intended for Rain.

    Two deaths that are more symbolic than real. The evidence: having endured an assault worse than her brother Tyler, Kay manages to reach the ship. Tyler should have survived. So should Kay, if she had not used the product developed by Weyland Industries. The deaths of a brother and sister at the hands of another brother and sister merely echo the film’s theme: to kill Remus.

    For this is precisely what Alvarez attempts here. Like in the Roman legend, his film is the twin brother of the original “Alien” from 1979, replicating scene for scene the same narrative. Just as in the legend, “Alien: Romulus” claims to establish a new series, one superior to that which followed “Alien” in 1979. Like in the legend, “Alien: Romulus” seeks to slay its brother, “Alien: Remus” (1979). Alvarez hopes to rid himself of the entire legacy and strength of the original “Alien” by employing the symbolism of the Roman legend. As in the tale of Abel and Cain, “Alien: Romulus,” out of jealousy, attempts to kill the film that started it all. Undoubtedly, like in the legend, we are not deceived and take sides with the original “Alien.”

  • ooli@lemmy.worldOPtoToday I Learned@lemmy.world•TIL about Çatalhöyük an anarcho communist city from 6500 BCEnglish
    21·
    1 month ago

    I heard about Catalhoyuk yesterday… So i have no clue how scientist are perceiving it. But the construction: all together under the same roof, with no street, is pretty striking.

    Obviously this dude calling it “anarcho communist” is biased… the wiki article seems to purposely avoid a neutral tone to make it clear.
    But I can see why he came to that conclusion. I dont think we have any other settlement even remotely resembling this one, to make a more informed guess

  • ooli@lemmy.worldtoAsklemmy@lemmy.ml•*Permanently Deleted*
    12·
    1 month ago

    So you think if something is bad enough it is ok to discriminate again. Meaning you place the bar of disparaging some contend at around average value , so not at high elite value.

    That can hold. It still depend on your value judgement of the content in question. Someone could think that lemmy.ml contend is “unfunny garbage”.

    The point of a site like this one, is that not one person is the decider. Not you or me. Users vote what is or is not funny, so that the “avergagely” funny systematically go on top. The more people they are, the more the average will mirror the real world population… I think considering the average population to not be “worthy” is pretty elitist. There are a lot of problem in such a site: Hive mind, trolling, mass vote, bot usage… But discriminating against normal human user (even the worse one) doesn’t seems to me like a solution