Another player who was at the table during the incident sent me this meme after the problem player in question (they had a history) left the group chat.

Felt like sharing it here because I’m sure more people should keep this kind of thing in mind.

  • JackbyDev@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    The amount of people in this thread who assume everyone with any type of disability or difference in ability would even want to have their condition corrected is shocking. Why is it impossible to imagine a blind person who doesn’t want their vision fixed for no other reason than they believe they’re fine as is? Why is that such a difficult thing to grasp? Just because free magical heal exists doesn’t mean everyone automatically wants it. You don’t need to turn to other explanations about why it might not be trusted or affordable when you can just say “this person is blind and doesn’t particularly care to be able to see.”

    • SadCack@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      I would guess that the vast amount of people with serious disabilities, paraplegic, blind, deaf, would jump at the opportunity to correct their issues.

      That would go doubley so for someone who lives in a d&d style world with far greater dangers and less accomodations than our own.

        • Mnemnosyne@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          This developed because it couldn’t be fixed in our world, long enough for these people to develop communities, culture, and literally their own language.

          In a world where it could always have been fixed, such communities and cultures are not likely to have ever developed, since the only people who could not get it fixed would be poor, and the poor are in a bad position to gather together in groups based on their shared experience and thus be able to form their own culture.

          Furthermore, people not wanting to be cured today exist in a world where there already are significant accomodations for their disabilities. It is not likely these people would be able to do this if our society had not made the collective decision to put in the effort needed to accommodate disabilities.

        • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Yes, but that is because they’ve either grown up that way or have been deaf for so long that they’re fully integrated into the sub culture. In a fantasy setting, deafness would be taken care of before it could influence people culturally

            • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              Parents finding out their baby was deaf would probably pay to get that healed asap. And people born with hearing and later lose it are probably going to want that fixed.

              Also, your “argument” of gasp, authoritarianism!!!1! is nothing but a strawman and makes you look ridiculous

              • JackbyDev@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                7 months ago

                You’re moving the goal posts. Originally you said,

                In a fantasy setting, deafness would be taken care of before it could influence people culturally

                Now you’re saying they probably would while still taking a tone of me being wrong. You can’t agree with me that deaf people would exist while still acting like I’m wrong.

                Also, what you described earlier is akin to eugenics. Forcefully fixing alleged disabilities without consent is absolutely authoritarian.

                • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  7 months ago

                  Forcefully fixing alleged disabilities without consent is absolutely authoritarian.

                  So a parent is wrong for wanting to fix their child’s disabilities? You’re actually insane if you believe that, and I hope you never have children

                  • JackbyDev@programming.dev
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    7 months ago

                    That is not what you said. You’re still moving the goal posts. You said something extreme and are stepping your position back when confronted with the reality of it.

    • EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      It’s a big case of “I don’t like myself as I am and this person with a disability accepts themself so there must me something wrong with me; I’ll take it out on them!” Style projection

      • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        No, it’s argued agaibst because it doesn’t make any sense logistically or economically.

        And no, handwaving it away because “it’s a fantasy setting, realism doesn’t matter” is not an argument. There’s a thing called suspension of disbelief, which requires a settng to be internally consistent.