A lot of people who think they’re saying “[actual fact]” are really just stating “[subjective opinion]” and call any criticism of their opinions “[incoherent rage]”
This is funny because I read it as “Democrats don’t control the weather and [they] create hurricanes to destroy Florida.”
Media literacy strikes again. You could state what you stated and yet someone will still believe they create hurricanes without the ability to control weather.
Not everything that is worth discussing has a source. Abstract ideas and hypothetical scenarios (among other things) have their places in rhetoric and communication.
A lot of people who think they’re saying “[actual fact]” are really just stating “[subjective opinion]” and call any criticism of their opinions “[incoherent rage]”
Actual fact: The democrats don’t control the weather and create hurricanes to destroy Florida.
Actual fact: abortion is a life saving medical procedure
Subjective anecdote: hurricanes are a life saving medical procedure.
Suggestive nematode:
How can you say them being suggestive if they haven’t suggested anything. Bro cant even talk.
Yeah, bro talks. You just don’t listen to him.
Also, he suggested watching Megamind again, which I accepted.
I think that we should all listen to him about this
Isn’t that it’s reproductive organ?
This is funny because I read it as “Democrats don’t control the weather and [they] create hurricanes to destroy Florida.”
Media literacy strikes again. You could state what you stated and yet someone will still believe they create hurricanes without the ability to control weather.
regular literacy
why downvotes??? is this some [Incoherent Rage]???
[freedom of speech]
[incoherent rage]
[[Hyperlink blocked]]
so a way to incorporate sources into the posts and judge them accordingly?
Not everything that is worth discussing has a source. Abstract ideas and hypothetical scenarios (among other things) have their places in rhetoric and communication.