ivonalanna@lemmy.world to Comic Strips@lemmy.world · 3 days agoNeed more fiberlemmy.worldimagemessage-square32fedilinkarrow-up1459arrow-down126
arrow-up1433arrow-down1imageNeed more fiberlemmy.worldivonalanna@lemmy.world to Comic Strips@lemmy.world · 3 days agomessage-square32fedilink
minus-squareI_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up32arrow-down4·3 days agoI would like to know what setup can transfer 8K wirelessly without issues.
minus-squareMetz@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up31·edit-23 days agoShouldn’t any WiFi from the last decade be sufficient? 8k with H.265 only needs a good 100mbps. Even the 15 year old 802.11n should be able to do that. Anything more modern would not even break a sweat.
minus-squareRob Bos@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up7·3 days agoEncoding h.265 on a small enough camera might be a problem? But if they have money …
minus-squareMonkderVierte@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up9·3 days agoHe just said it’s a 8k monitor, not the camera.
minus-squareKbobabob@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·3 days agoIt says ultra -hd which is 4K and that can be transmitted wirelessly.
minus-squarePsythik@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 days agoWhich is why it’s such a strange request. Why splurge on an 8K TV if you’re only going to watch 4K video on it?
I would like to know what setup can transfer 8K wirelessly without issues.
Shouldn’t any WiFi from the last decade be sufficient? 8k with H.265 only needs a good 100mbps. Even the 15 year old 802.11n should be able to do that. Anything more modern would not even break a sweat.
Encoding h.265 on a small enough camera might be a problem? But if they have money …
He just said it’s a 8k monitor, not the camera.
It says ultra -hd which is 4K and that can be transmitted wirelessly.
Which is why it’s such a strange request. Why splurge on an 8K TV if you’re only going to watch 4K video on it?