TheImpressiveX@lemmy.mlM to movies@lemm.eeEnglish · 17 hours agoAccording to the Wall Street Journal, "Wicked" Parts One and Two cost $320 million ($160 million per film). Both parts were shot back-to-back.lemmy.mlimagemessage-square11fedilinkarrow-up145arrow-down13file-textcross-posted to: movies@lemmy.world
arrow-up142arrow-down1imageAccording to the Wall Street Journal, "Wicked" Parts One and Two cost $320 million ($160 million per film). Both parts were shot back-to-back.lemmy.mlTheImpressiveX@lemmy.mlM to movies@lemm.eeEnglish · 17 hours agomessage-square11fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: movies@lemmy.world
minus-squareFlocklesscrow@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·edit-27 hours agoI have no problem with musicals. Wicked was published in 1995. Making this movie might have made sense up to 2009, but now? It’s a sentimental cash-grab. Same reason they’re making Gladiator 2.
I have no problem with musicals.
Wicked was published in 1995. Making this movie might have made sense up to 2009, but now? It’s a sentimental cash-grab. Same reason they’re making Gladiator 2.