this is a topic i’ve been heavily involved with because i still consider myself to be someone who prefers using technology at a very beginner friendly level, plus it’s very good when a linux operating system makes you feel right at home when it has a modern desktop environment. this is why i really like gnome, its simplicity and usability is something available for everyone, for beginners and for a lot of other people, but if you had to, say, rearrange xfce or kde for someone who was an elderly person or an absolute beginner so that they wouldn’t have any trouble using linux, how would you do it? (screenshot is my current linux mint desktop, very simple and extremely user friendly!!!)

  • woelkchen@lemmy.world
    2·
    1 day ago

    Is that a practical question looking for a real solution right now or is more of a philosophical question?

    If the latter:

    Tech should be approachable by teaching users and add safeguards, not by dumbing things down to a degree users stay dumb. Options should be easy to find, preview what they do, and always offer to restore defaults. A desktop for extreme beginners may even adopt an idea from gaming and have them do a tutorial section first. It may even double as a wizard of which accessibility features to enable for elderly users.

  • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
    7·
    2 days ago

    No, Gnome is a non-starter for being as mouse negative as it is. You are very heavily supposed to use Gnome with keyboard shortcuts and it will only sometimes begrudgingly allow you to use the mouse.

    I also really want to kick the app drawer in the head. Why is it two operations deep? Why can’t it be sorted by category like every other Linux app menu?

    I would go with Mint Cinnamon, increase font sizes or UI scaling, switch to the Cinnemenu because it offers bigger square icons rather than a tiny list, turn off a lot of its extra features, and put launchers for commonly used applications on the desktop. Configure updates to automatic, and otherwise sand down a few rough edges and I think you’re good to go.

  • intensely_human@lemm.ee
    3·
    2 days ago

    I’d made the default desktop wallpaper just some text that says “try typing man man in the terminal”

  • Wooki@lemmy.world
    7·
    2 days ago

    Block or remove the terminal and judge the disastrous performance on its ability to work after the fact

  • HexesofVexes@lemmy.world
    41·
    3 days ago

    It’s going to sound really silly but here goes:

    1. Ensure their background is the same as it was (seriously, they often use it as an extra way to find things).

    2. Where possible, use windows icons for desktop shortcuts and mask link names to match vocab they’re familiar with.

    3. Have rustdesk set up with a link saying “Let <your name> help me”.

    4. Make sure they have their password written down somewhere.

    5. Make sure you have their password written down somewhere.

    6. Where possible have background updating, where not possible have a .sh file to do it for them.

    7. Add desktop links for things like downloads, documents and pictures.

    These are tips for any distro when moving less tech savvy relatives over. For those that like to game, ensure your fs on their gaming drive is a Linux one as it stops weird behaviour. Also, you know, install the games for them!

    • Scrollone@feddit.it
      4·
      2 days ago

      I’d also add the tip of installing a Windows-looking window theme. People just want the classic window buttons (X for close, etc.), not some fancy icons.

    • mac@lemm.ee
      2·
      3 days ago

      I’m out and about right now so won’t get too deep into it as it’s easily searchable, but last I checked the community consensus around rustdesk was negative

      • HexesofVexes@lemmy.world
        1·
        3 days ago

        Feel free to replace it with the remote tool of your choice. Just keep in mind that it needs to be easy to use from the supportee’s end (double click, read a code).

  • WolfLink@sh.itjust.works
    51·
    2 days ago

    You have to be able to do everything you need, including modifying things, updating, installing software, and fixing issues without using the command line at all, and the amount you have to modify and fix really has to be minimal.

  • Destide@feddit.ukEnglish
    1·
    1 day ago

    You have to remember older people grew up with computers that are pretty similar to how most of us use Linux. Mint, bluefin would be my choices for someone with lower tech experience.

  • hperrin@lemmy.caEnglish
    523·
    3 days ago

    ChromeOS is already an operating system for children. Like, literally. Schools use it because it works well and is really easy to use, and runs on very cheap hardware.

    • SGG@lemmy.worldEnglish
      101·
      3 days ago

      Agreed. Get them a ChromeOS device, or get a good refurb business class laptop and put ChromeOS flex on it.

      Yes it’s not what OP is probably wanting, but this gives them a device that is hard to mess up with a minimum of training.

    • Rudee@lemmy.ml
      6·
      3 days ago

      Ahh, so the solution is to install gentoo and customise it for simplicity and minimal user permissions /s

      • sunbeam60@lemmy.one
        81·
        3 days ago

        “Web printing”. Basically the printer connects to Google, the laptop connects to Google and your printing goes via Google. Why not give your advertisement profiler everything you print too?

        No that’s not right.

      • adarza@lemmy.caEnglish
        11·
        3 days ago

        right. so basically:

        only run on ‘certified’ hardware. greatly simplifies hw support required.

        hide all the stuff that gets users into trouble, or better–don’t even have it available at all.

        limit what’s installable.

        dumb it down.

  • kadup@lemmy.world
    31·
    3 days ago

    Honestly, there isn’t much to it when setting up Linux for elderly people - in fact, I find it less troublesome than setting it up for a teenager.

    Most often the issues regular users face with Linux are related to installing packages from external sources or broken updates. Elderly people tend to not do that.

    Set up a stable distro like Debian, Linux Mint or Ubuntu LTS with KDE Plasma or Cinnamon, install LibreOffice, Okular and a browser with strong ad blocking, and any other applications you think they might need. Enable a simple firewall, hide the root / folder from the file browser’s sidebar, and you’re done. Perhaps set up scaling to make everything bigger on their monitors, disable mouse acceleration and set the speed slightly slower than usual.

    I wouldn’t bother with immutable distros, Flatpaks are nice and all until permissions turn using a simple app a confusing chore with broken interactions.

    • perishthethought@lemm.eeEnglish
      8·
      3 days ago

      All good ideas, IMO.

      And I had to look this up, so:

      https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Okular

      Okular is a multiplatform document viewer developed by the KDE community and based on Qt and KDE Frameworks libraries. It is distributed as part of the KDE Applications bundle

      And I’m a KDE user! ʘ‿ʘ

      • kadup@lemmy.world
        6·
        3 days ago

        Yep! Okular is amazing, and it’s available on Windows too. Install it for someone and they’ll never bother you again about PDFs or EPUB documents, it’s performant and everything works: printing, resizing, selecting text, searching, signing, adding comments. Never worry about paid PDF software or shady slow apps that keep trying to gatekeep features.

    • desentizised@lemm.ee
      4·
      3 days ago

      I think it’s a fair point that immutable distros are still a developing concept and probably not ready for primetime, but I do feel that eventually this must be the answer to make things absolutely bulletproof for people (of which there are many) who have a natural ability of nuking their OS.

      • AlligatorBlizzard@sh.itjust.works
        2·
        3 days ago

        Sure, but I wouldn’t expect an elderly user to be one of the people with the natural ability to nuke their OS.

        I’ve daily driven Bazzite, an immutable distro, since July, and I haven’t seen the kind of Flatpak issues they talk about - or frankly any major issues, this whole experience has been way easier than Windows ever was with updates (it took me a few minutes to figure out Proton and Heroic launcher though). I didn’t know about the new Fedora update until I booted up and my lock screen was different. My experience is that Bazzite (and likely all of the other uBlue Fedoras) is fantastic and absolutely ready now.

        That said, nothing is more stable than something like Debian. Unless you’ve got some hardcore gamer grandma I think the immutable distros are a solution to a problem not present in OPs hypothetical.

        • oaklandnative@lemmy.world
          3·
          2 days ago

          I agree with the uBlue recommendation. The best thing about these for OP is that they update automatically on reboots, with zero user interaction. I can easily imagine anyone getting nervous accepting a Mint update and watching all the text zoom by. You don’t see any of that with uBlue.

          *I am using and loving Bluefin.

          https://projectbluefin.io/

        • desentizised@lemm.ee
          2·
          3 days ago

          To me it’s like the old saying from Win9x days “Help, I’ve deleted the internet”. Removing an Internet Explorer shortcut from the desktop might be easier than nuking a Linux installation, but I think if the point is to be of service to absolute tech-illiterates then you need to be ready for anything, any edge case. And like you say, if Flatpaks and all that just work then what would be the downside of immutability?

          I mean in theory one can make deep-rooted changes to macOS, but I haven’t once seen it fail to upgrade successfully. And I definitely wouldn’t consider Windows immutable with how many things can go wrong in practice. I’ve had more than a few customers who lost wifi drivers through no fault of their own, in one case the entire device wasn’t visible anymore, so reinstalling a driver wouldn’t have done anything, all I could do was roll back the feature update and ensure it won’t install it again. In that sense, immutable Linux might even be the best offering out there today. The only thing it lacks (besides Android and SteamOS) is a multi-billion dollar company backing it for wider desktop adoption.

  • CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world
    9·
    3 days ago

    Aurora Linux + KDE

    It’s an immutable version of Fedora with flatpack support.

    This is actually a good setup for the vast majority of people.

      • CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world
        2·
        3 days ago

        It uses Universal Blue, whereas Kinoite uses rpm-ostree.

        Aurora has a bit of DE customization, which is arguably more polished.

        It also leans heavily on Flatpack/Flathub.

        The other difference that I’m aware of is Aurora handles updates automatically by default, whereas Kinoite is a manual process.

        To be clear, I haven’t used Kinoite at all. But I have Aurora on a gaming system that I use as a kind of TV gaming console, and I’m setting it up for my elderly parents that get upset when an icon on Windows changes (that’s how tech illiterate they are).

  • daggermoon@lemmy.world
    7·
    3 days ago

    Something that automatically updates. Despite my best efforts my mom still has me update her Mint install.

      • daggermoon@lemmy.world
        1·
        2 days ago

        Then I gotta teach my mom to use modern GNOME. That sounds like hell. It’s fine for younger people but for old people who are familiar with Windows it’s a nightmare.