- cross-posted to:
- games@sh.itjust.works
- cross-posted to:
- games@sh.itjust.works
I have no idea about the game and whether it actually contains gambling content or is just being auto flagged due to the title but this kind of crap is why I hate big tech and is why I hope we eventually have a future where decentralized services rule over big tech.
It’s a strategy/puzzle/autobattler game.
It’s loosely gambling themed in that it uses one of those pull the handle spiny wheel mechanics to draw your “units” for the turn and has some gambling iconography.
The issue here would be overreactive governments setting rules about gambling and children, being unable to differentiate a game game and a lootbox machine.
Doing absolutely nothing about lootboxes though.
IMO a gambling label should only be considered if there’s is real money involved in the game combined with chance (ie: lootboxes)
Making the rating boards only look at the old-fashioned method of gambling (casino or casino-themed mecanism) while disregarding the monetary factor doesn’t help anyone.
Its a themed slot machine with fictionalised in game currency.
Defeat your landlord in this slot machine roguelike deckbuilder!
If rated today Australia would give it R18+, but it was reviewed before last years changes so it has been grandfathered in at M with the description “Simulated Gambling”.
Simulated gambling seems to have been grouped in as an adjacent issue as some jurisdictions regulate loot boxes.
Balatro is in a similar position in Australia where it is PG on the play store, M on switch and would be R18+ if reviewed today.
I would just like to add that Australia has the world’s worst gambling IIRC. Our govt is happy to fuck over peoples lives and take money from gambling but a videogame loosely related is a serious issue in need of stopping.
Have you uploaded it to FDroid?
Since OP isn’t the developer of the game, I don’t see how they could. Also it looks like a paid game.