• surph_ninja@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Can someone explain to me how they believe the Trump team convinced Biden to sign the ban?

    If you think it was a stunt for the benefit of Trump, you’re implying the Biden admin was in on it. Doesn’t make sense to me. Seems the more likely scenario is Biden just royally fucked up again to the point of somehow making Trump look good.

  • recreationalcatheter@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Yes.

    Do you know any dopamine addicts who lost their minds for a week straight? You know the ones. Giving more permissions to shady apps to scratch their itch?

    Sad world we live in lolol.

  • Freefall@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Yeah, the super obvious political stunt was a political stunt. It only fools those that don’t pay any attention or don’t know how anything works. Biden said he would not enforce the order, that trump signed during his first term, to ban tiktok. Then tiktok chose to shut itself down for a day and chose to turn itself back on with its political pandering notice. It is all to manipulate it’s users while also paying fealty to the incoming president (because China knows that is how easy he is to control).

  • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    11 hours ago

    It likely was, hell it had me fooled. I was honestly about to say “Maybe I was wrong about him? Maybe Kamala losing won’t be so bad…”

    But then he signed the Transgender order and on the same day Musk did the Nazi salute and I’m like “And this is what I get for questioning my own world view.”

    At least I voted Harris in the election and spent literally only two or three days (17-20) being fooled, and let’s be honest, it was Copium, not truly being swayed

    • AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      I was honestly about to say “Maybe I was wrong about him? Maybe Kamala losing won’t be so bad…”

      And this is why democracy sucks. Voters have the memory of a flea and the emotions of a toddler.

      - “Democracy is the worst form of govt except for all the other ones that have been tried”

  • CixoUwU@lemmy.cixoelectronic.pl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Yes, I also think that was bait, because ban started few days before begin of Trump term and ban was not really working. It had a lot of bugs, simple VPN could byoass it, “YES, user who logged in ONLY from USA and now loggin from Europ REALLY IS NOT AN AMERICAN NOW!!!”. That two things make me to think it was a bait.

  • pedroapero@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    22 hours ago

    All CEOs understood how to behave with such an arrogant person: flatter him and he will bow to your every wims.

    • Petter1@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Bow even harder and you get pardoned for every crime you did…

      Who came up with this pardon shit anyway?!

  • Naia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Trump started the whole thing because he was unpopular on Tiktok. Republicans jumped on board because young people were politically organizing on the platform and they don’t like that.

    But up to that point, there was no really effort, even as much as they tried to claim “national security”.

    Then when the real information about Palestine was being spread there the democrats jumped on board because they are the same as republicans when if comes to foreign policy.

    That’s what started the actual push that gained momentum. They had no actual evidence about the stuff they claimed. Also, if the claim applied to Tiktok, it applies to all the other social media. But they don’t actually care about privacy. They only care about a platform that they couldn’t control and wasn’t catering to them.

    If they cared about privacy, they would have pushed general privacy legislation and/or regulation and oversight on all social media.

    The reversal was Biden realizing he does not have a good legacy and with Trump, there was a lot more content this time around that was pro-trump (and also tiktok gave him a million dollars). So now he gets to claim he “saved tiktolk” when he was the start of the whole thing.

  • Letme@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    Sort of, yes. It is a counterintelligence/disinformation app, and for that reason it makes MAGA look good. MAGA now controls all 3 of the top disinformation apps: Twitter, Facebook , and Tiktok. This is the war on truth; facts and honesty lost.

    • peregrin5@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 day ago

      Not to mention they’ve bought out every previously legitimate news source.

  • 2ugly2live@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    66
    ·
    1 day ago

    Lmao, yes.

    He “brought it back” before he was even in office. And since no one looks up anything, I’m sure it did it’s job.

    • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 hours ago

      How do people not see through this theatre? It wasn’t even subtle. Oh right, the brainrot…

    • jaemo@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Trump’s basically a fractal hypocrisy, which is, as I understand it, why and how the grift keeps grifting.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      How so? It was politically convenient to go after TikTok when he did it, and it’s politically convenient to reverse course now. That’s a pretty consistent gameplan from Trump, attack something when it’s popular, reverse when reversing is popular.

      • Freefall@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 hours ago

        It is more in line with a puppet, that has zero understanding of anything, being told what to say as it is convenient.

      • small44@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        When he came with the ban idea he used the same argument of national security that is the hypocritical part. Like you say the real reason is just political convenient

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          He also claimed national security when he messed with tariffs. At this point, it’s just an excuse to do something to grab headlines.

    • aname@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      If we were talking about a sane person, I don’t see why a person cannot change his mind.

      Trump is just playing the fools.

      • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Trump doesn’t have a mind to change. I doubt he even remembers he ever proposed a ban and this is just some advisor telling him that doing the opposite of Biden will get him likes.