• Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    Why is everyone making this about a U.S. vs. China thing and not an LLMs suck and we should not be in favor of them anywhere thing?

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 days ago

      Well LLMs don’t necessarily always suck, but they do suck compared to how much key parties are trying to shove then down our throats. If this pops the bubble by making it too cheap to be worth grifting over, then maybe a lot of the worst players and investors back off and no one cares if you use an LLM or not and they settle in to be used only to the extent people actually want to. We also move past people claiming the are way better than they are, or that they are always just on the cusp of something bigger, if the grifters lose motivation.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        It will be nice if we could stop having headlines of “AGI by April”.

        • jj4211@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          Last I saw the promise was 'AGI real soon, but not before 2027", threading the needle between “we are going to have an advancement that will change the fundamentals of how the economy even works” and “but there’s still time to get in and get the benefits of the current economy on our way to that breakthrough”

    • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      Fucking exactly. Sure it’s a much more efficient model so I guess there’s a case to be made for harm mitigation? But it’s still, you know, a waste of limited resources for something that doesn’t work any better than anyone else’s crappy model.