cm0002@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 2 months agoWhy indeedlemmy.mlexternal-linkmessage-square166fedilinkarrow-up11.42Karrow-down125cross-posted to: programmerhumor@lemmy.ml
arrow-up11.4Karrow-down1external-linkWhy indeedlemmy.mlcm0002@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 2 months agomessage-square166fedilinkcross-posted to: programmerhumor@lemmy.ml
minus-squareNoSpotOfGround@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down2·2 months agoExcept… the compilation step doesn’t add type safety to JS. As an aside, type safety hasn’t been something I truly miss in JS, despite how often it’s mentioned.
minus-squareLifter@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up9·2 months agoI think they are talking about typescript which is compiled into javascript
minus-squareNoSpotOfGround@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 month agoOk, that could be true. I assumed they meant the “building” phase that some frameworks go through.
Except… the compilation step doesn’t add type safety to JS.
As an aside, type safety hasn’t been something I truly miss in JS, despite how often it’s mentioned.
I think they are talking about typescript which is compiled into javascript
Ok, that could be true. I assumed they meant the “building” phase that some frameworks go through.