• Soggy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s not ideal, sure. All man-made structures are bad in that sense, and an 18 hole golf course is far from the most efficient user/area recreation facility. Doesn’t mean it’s an evil and irredeemable pastime.

      • RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        They are massive ecological dead areas with little to offer anything other than the humans playing golf.

        Golf is bad for the environment because lawns and the notion of the English Garden are very bad for the environment.

        • Soggy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Virtually all outdoor sports are guilty of this but golf is singled out because of the perceived (and sometimes very real) classism association. People aren’t in here calling for the death of elementary school playgrounds or movie theaters or anything else that results in acres of land used for any purpose but native habitat. You know what’s worse than golf courses? Impermeable surfaces. Buildings and parking lots and concrete interrupting the naturally slow seep of water from rainfall to ocean or aquifer, massively accelerating erosion and destroying riparian ecosystems.

          I’d much rather see a push for native rooftop gardens and better wetland management and a change in city planning that embraces greenbelts and preserves the watershed.

          • RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Golf is singled out because of how much larger that dead zone is. It’s a massive stretch if dead space that requires water, fertilizers and pesticides while offering little benefit for most people.

            GOLF. IS. BAD. FOR. THE. ENVIRONMENT.

            • Soggy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              water, fertilizers and pesticides

              It doesn’t require these things, that’s just what people are accustomed to. And there’s no need to shout. I studied ecology with a focus on watersheds, I know exactly how bad chemical fertilizers, pesticides, and irrigation can be. I still think your priorities are off.