• Tiresia@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    1 month ago

    A human drawing a thumbnail in 15 minutes consumes 0.025 kWh. An AI creating an image consumes between 0.06 and 0.3 kWh, so between 3 and 12 times as much. Both have massive supply chains that go into producing and maintaining them.

    • aleq@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      I don’t really have a horse in this race eitherway, but what about finding a person who can draw a decent looking thumbnail in 15 minutes? Probably that’s gonna be using various webservices such as fiverr or something along the way?

      But the whole idea of comparing them is kinda funny. As if that human would just be turned off and not consuming any energy if they weren’t making a thumbnail for your blog. Though maybe they’ll make a cup of coffee they wouldn’t have otherwise before getting to work. You never know!

    • MeatsOfRage@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 month ago

      15 minutes is crazy fast and assumes they just get exactly what they want first go. You need to factor in running your PC using Photoshop or equivalent, which is fairly resource intensive, sustained over what is realistically 40-60 minutes at best, sourcing assets from servers which are using energy to serve the images. Compared with AI which has high usage for sure but it’s extremely short bursts.