• kn33@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 days ago

    I just don’t consider “it” to be depriving animals of “being” status.

    • wheeldawg@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      You know what…

      I went and looked this up because of this comment. I had never heard of “it” being used like that.

      I’ve only ever heard it being used to specify something specifically as a non-person, or more generally a “being”. So I thought it was literally defining it as a non-being.

      So TIL. I wasn’t trying to be prejudiced, I have literally never heard of “it” being anything other than specifically a non-living object.

      So thanks for the chance to learn something interesting today.