• Azzu@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    systemd moment in the sense that someone not affiliated with systemd used systemd to write a stop job that doesn’t terminate quickly? Or that you willingly installed software that brought along a slow stop job with it?

    This is like so far away from systemd’s fault, idk, it must just be a meme right?

    • juipeltje@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      Pretty sure i’ve had this happen with services i didn’t even create, but yeah it was just a joke, i don’t care about init systems, but i don’t recall this ever happening when i was using runit.

      • Azzu@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        I don’t know runit. Maybe runit didn’t even have a way to delay or customize shutdown, maybe it always just waits 5 seconds and then forcibly terminates a process, resulting in you never noticing when a cleanup job was too slow. Maybe you just randomly never installed a particular program with a slow shutdown job while using runit. There’s a bunch of reasonable explanations and possibilities for why this difference exists, and they can all mean systemd is perfectly reasonable.

        • juipeltje@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Alright man, fact remains i was just making a silly joke, you don’t have to be poettering’s pr team lol

          • Azzu@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            You’re the one who brought up runit and insinuated it doesn’t have this problem ¯_(ツ)_/¯