• BackgrndNoize@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    There is no reason why taxes pooled together from all of our incomes cannot be used to subsidize Healthcare, education and a basic living income for all citizens. But if everone no longer had to worry about survival, no one would put up with corporate abuse from rich cunts and plus if they’d paid their fair share of taxes and couldn’t just steal tax money to gamble with, they’d never be as filthy rich as they are to begin with.

    • pressanykeynow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      3 months ago

      taxes pooled together from all of our incomes cannot be used to subsidize Healthcare, education and a basic living income for all citizens

      Well that’s how it’s done in most rich and even some poor countries. So I assume you are talking about the US which is indeed in a terrible situation with human rights for it’s wealth. And sadly voting red/blue won’t ever change it.

      • KelvarIW@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        I’m increasingly coming to the point that legislators are people, like you and me.

        Maybe if we focused less on convincing Congress, and more on occupying Congress, we would have solved these problems… whether as Progressive Democrats or Independents.

    • backgroundcow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      What you describe is more or less the Nordic economic model, except the basic income. Corporate abuse is low, because it is not unthinkable to “not work” in response to such abuse, but also because unions are strong. Nevertheless, a lot of people still work a lot, so it doesn’t completely change the work/life balance oddity op is posting about.