• bane_killgrind@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    Things don’t happen that way. “Can, may, could” means that there will be pockets of people that don’t subscribe to the ideology and undermine it.

        • seeigel@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          You are welcome.

          What’s your opinion if you don’t mind me asking?

          • bane_killgrind@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            That’s a very uneducated take, and shows that you don’t understand how access to information can be changed, and modeled to elicit certain outcomes.

            • seeigel@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              I was arguing that history is not needed when we have access to all experiences so we can ignore history if it is tainted.

              You say that relying on wrong history is dangerous and in the original comment, you say that well cited information is essential.

              There is no real contradiction but you have shown how access to information can be changed, or framed, and modeled to elicit certain outcomes.

              • bane_killgrind@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                Define “tainted”, “wrong”(your word I never used that word) and how the context of history is not required to detect such things.

                Define what we know in a way that doesn’t have a historical basis.