Back in January Microsoft encrypted all my hard drives without saying anything. I was playing around with a dual boot yesterday and somehow aggravated Secureboot. So my C: panicked and required a 40 character key to unlock.

Your key is backed up to the Microsoft account associated with your install. Which is considerate to the hackers. (and saved me from a re-install) But if you’ve got an unactivated copy, local account, or don’t know your M$ account credentials, your boned.

Control Panel > System Security > Bitlocker Encryption.

BTW, I was aware that M$ was doing this and even made fun of the effected users. Karma.

  • UncleGrandPa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    92
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    6 months ago

    They desperately wanted to eliminate personal computers and replace them with dumb terminals running over the net.

    When the public rejected this idea

    THIS is their response. They are still insisting on total control of our computers.

    • VitoRobles@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      They desperately wanted to eliminate personal computers and replace them with dumb terminals running over the net.

      I don’t know about that.

      Dumb terminal concept was more what Chromebook was doing.

      Microsoft is doing something even stupider.

      • CafecitoHippo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Dumb terminal concept was more what Chromebook was doing.

        I mean, for a lot of people they’re fine especially if they’re priced appropriately. Especially with a lot more software as a service out there. My problem is that all of them have a built in drop dead date on when they’re going to stop getting updates and there’s not really a great option for the devices post ChromeOS.

        ChromeOS certainly can be a good system. I still have my old CR-48 from when I got selected to test the OS and even when it was in its infancy, it was solid. I used it for a lot of my college career because it was better than my Asus eeePC which had Ubuntu on it.

          • KeenFlame@feddit.nu
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            I have never bought a device I could not own completely and flash the rom with what I want. Except once I had iPhone 3 but it was easily jail broken, but I still feel dirty. How can someone think they own and control something I bought? There is something fundamentally wrong with that and I agree it should be illegal

      • jim3692@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        I think they want you to only use Windows and pay for cloud storage.

        By enforcing BitLocker and Secure Boot, they are trying to eliminate dual-booting (you don’t need to dual-boot Windows/Linux anyway, as you can just use WSL2 /s).

        By enforcing disk encryption, in general, they try to force the use of cloud storage, by making data recovery nearly impossible. Most people are probably too lazy to buy external storage, and manually copy their files over.

        This guarantees 2 money streams. One from Windows’s tracking/advertising and the other from OneDrive subscriptions.

      • Don_alForno@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        MS execs blathered about “the age of software running locally being over” long before Chromebooks.

    • toastmeister@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Not to mention DRM. They want to own your computer and prevent any kind of modification so that movie producers give them money.

          • KeenFlame@feddit.nu
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            Not really. Your problem in us is the lobbying lawyers. It’s a political systematic problem. The demonic corp entities that crave endless growth will never not do anything that could potentially suck any data from or control a customer. The ones that get “money” for things like this are your law makers. The Republican authoritarian faschists are the winners, along with billionaires that can afford to buy laws. No movie producer. No one in any business except exploitation on the mass scale can profit from these moves. In some countries it is illegal. In the us it is business

              • KeenFlame@feddit.nu
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                So not movie producers. You just mentioned them as another category being fucked? Because that’s what they are

                • JackbyDev@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  6 months ago

                  The film industry benefits from HDCP and all DRM, they aren’t being fucked. I’ve looked back over the conversation, I think you have it flipped in your head.

                  • KeenFlame@feddit.nu
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    6 months ago

                    No. The movie producers get none of the profits of a movie. Much like game devs don’t get the profits of their games. The venture capital and wealthy owners, as previously discussed get the profit. You know this. You know what error you made. Stop slinking around so we can correct the facts