• But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    It’s weird how the reverse is somehow ok now. Anne Boleyn played by a black woman why not? Historical accurac? What even is that?? .

    Edit: you’re all ignoring that most of the roles being blackwashed are not white, how is it ok for black culture to just appropriate our own ethnic figures?

    • Honytawk@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Because people aren’t depicting Jesus as a white Caucasian male?

      If the skin colour isn’t relevant to the story, it doesn’t matter. If it is relevant, it does.

      • But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Jesus was a Palestinian, so it’s ok to take Arab jobs and give em to black actors? Cleopatra was Greek/arab so I guess they can take their roles too.

        It’s funny how everyone who isn’t black is suddenly white when it’s convenient. This isn’t black actors taking the roles of white Americans, it’s black actors playing Egyptians, Greeks, arabs, latinos, Asians. Are all those people white??

    • myotheraccount@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      9 hours ago

      It is different, if color of skin is a relevant part of the context of the story. Having John Brown played by a black man would be equally misleading.

      For Anne Boleyn’s story on the other hand, racism did not play a part, because it wasn’t even invented yet.