(not OC)

  • Reddfugee42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    26
    ·
    10 months ago

    She lost by one of the slimmest popular vote margins in history. But other than that, yeah, are never really had a chance

    • GnuLinuxDude@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      Damn, really? Maybe the Democrats shouldn’t have put up a doddering, old, dementia-addled, genocide-enabling maniac for President, then, so that there wasn’t the whole candidate-switcheroo last second. Let me go blame myself for this.

        • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          27
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          10 months ago

          Lol. “I’m ok with committing genocide, so long as its done solemnly and not gleefully.”

          Though so far, Trump has been more willing to break from Israel than Biden ever was.

          • Reddfugee42@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            10 months ago

            Oh clearly, starting with moving consulates into contested territory. You seem really well informed.

            • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              13
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              10 months ago

              Imagine seeing a whole population being butchered and thinking the location of the consulate is what matters.

              And if Kamala had won, the US would still be bombing Yemen on behalf of Israel.

    • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      10 months ago

      This was literally the worst electoral map for the Democrats since 1988 when Republicans won Illinois and California.

      • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        10 months ago

        Yeah but she almost won the entirely symbolic popular vote, she’s basically the next FDR!

        • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Non sequitor. Not what I said and not a Republican.

          Campaigns are about winning swing states, those are just the rules of the game. Kamala lost that game worse than any Democrat in nearly 40 years. Maybe the rules we have aren’t fair, and if they were different, she would’ve lost by a smaller margin. But then, both campaigns would’ve been run completely differently, the same candidates might not have even been the nominees, etc.

          By the actual rules of the actual game, Kamala lost extremely badly.

        • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          10 months ago

          Like it’s just republicans.

          Talk to a centrist about raising the national minimum wage sometime, and it becomes clear quickly that they don’t care at all about raising the minimum wage once their state has done it.

    • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      Popular vote doesn’t determine who’s president; Harris got washed in the election.

      • Reddfugee42@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        24
        ·
        10 months ago

        It and it ALONE determines the successfulness of a campaign in converting hearts and minds.

        • ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          27
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Yeah, like how in 2016 Trump lost the popular vote and we never heard from him again

          • Reddfugee42@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            10 months ago

            The topic is who doesn’t have a chance to win an election period you keep trying over and over and over and over and over again to change the topic but I won’t let you.

            The topic is who doesn’t have a chance to win an election.

            Someone who gets the most votes doesn’t really fall in that category no matter how many times you try to change the topic.

            • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              Your the one who keeps trying to change the topic away from the metric that actually determines who wins the election.

              And Harris didn’t get the most votes.

          • Reddfugee42@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            13
            ·
            10 months ago

            I bet that made sense in your head. Good thing you have a cute little fan base to up vote your nonsense comments