had a good view at least

  • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    8 months ago

    Not need. Had the partner come down and get me in the truck. This is about 8 miles from where I live. We try and ride it everyday and flats happen all the time.

        • Opinionhaver@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          Sure, but I’d still argue that the vast majority of flats people get would have been avoided by running tubeless. I’ve fixed around 8 punctures over the past 10,000km and only one of them was such that tire sealant wouldn’t have fixed.

          • 𝕮𝕬𝕭𝕭𝕬𝕲𝕰@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            Fair enough - I suppose it’s a caution borne out of experience of the awful roads by me - I’ve had a lot of unsealable punctures on the roads near me (from gashes to a bit of glass that wiggled around just enough to not seal).

            As a result I always caveat advice to go tubeless - for “proper” punctures (anything more serious than a pin prick or snakebite) tubeless can be a can of worms, and give people a sense of confidence that inner tube users don’t have (wisely).

            Granted it’s also down to tyre choice (you can pry my patched panaracers from my cold dead hands) but a tyre pissing sealant and air is much more of a hassle to deal with than an inner tube in my experience.