• otacon239@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      9 months ago

      Unless you wanted high transfer speeds for something like an iPhone if you’re transferring videos, then you’d need something like 12 or 13 poles. Now imagine accidentally yanking on the port of a modern smartphone tripping over the cable.

      I could only generate about 9 poles in my testing.

      • MTK@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 months ago

        Just make the usb-c connector a circule and not an oval. I am guessing that the only reasons it isn’t circular is thinness (devices are thin and need thin connectors) and manufacturing costs (probably harder to get it circular with all of the inner pins)

        • Rose@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          Hmm, maybe just use some variation of DIN connector? It’s a circle, but keyed to one position, and fairly effortless to plug in the right way without seeing. Also full size DIN connectors are robust as hell and can be easily replaced and rewired.

          Hell, my Commodore 64 IEC bus cables still work after decades, and I can’t say the same about many USB cables these days.

          • drathvedro@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            inb4: people try to connect them by jamming and twisting, bending the pins into a spiral and then pushing even harder causing them to break off.

        • otacon239@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          9 months ago

          Considering the 1/4” jack has been around for literal eons (1877, no joke), there’s sort of just tradition when you compare it to the 3.5mm from the 1950s. The primary reason being durability. Your guitar is probably going to be yanked on pretty rough a few times compared to something as little as a phone that will just rip out of your hand. On the guitar, it’d probably damage the port pretty quickly.

          • DahGangalang@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            That’s interesting. So there’s no major signal degradation or limit between the two cable sizes? I always assumed it was something like that that would make the larger jack preferable.

            • otacon239@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              9 months ago

              Not really. Until you get down to really small sizes, the human ear can’t perceive the signal noise. If you’re recording at a full studio level, the lower the noise floor, the better, and thicker cables/ports are better, but for most indie stuff, 3.5mm would suffice just fine for audio quality. Also, if you amping the signal like crazy, that could theoretically help with noise.

      • lime!@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        9 months ago

        i used to have an mp3-player with only an audio jack, and a USB-to-TRRS cable for charging and data transfer.

        i think it had 64MB of storage?

        point is, it’s been a thing

        Edit:

        also my keyboard! the two halves are connected together via audio jack.