• katy ✨@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    i had a hard time getting used to them but now i love them in mint i can switch between the package version and flatpak version and usually the fp one is more updated

    • muzzle@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      4 months ago

      On the other hand each flatpak uses >1Gb of disk where deb packages rarely require more than 100Mb

      • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        See, I only use flatpaks sparingly for this reason, but in some cases they’re indispensable when you don’t want an application to access certain parts of your system. The sandboxing is what makes them useful, in my opinion. For everything else, there’s the deb packages.

      • comfy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        4 months ago

        Plus I found on my install flatpak wasn’t cleaning up the flatpaks autoinstalled for older versions of nvidia drivers, they were all still listed as dependencies. Not sure who’s to blame but that was taking up a few much needed GBs.

        • HayadSont@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          I agree that flatpak should just invoke flatpak uninstall --unused right after uninstalling a flatpak. I don’t get why it doesn’t do this automatically. Granted, some distro package managers (used to) operate somewhat similarly in that they required the autoremove option.

          • comfy@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            I actually tried flatpak uninstall --unused and it didn’t remove these ones. So there’s something odd going on there. My guess is maybe Mint manually installed them through the driver manager program? That’s a wild guess, I don’t know how it works.

      • RedSnt 👓♂️🧩 🧠 🖥️@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        That’s certainly a concern for some, but I’m using like 30 GB for all the things I’ve installed, which is a lot (12 (flatpak-system), 76 (flatpak-user)) but that’s on a 2 TB drive, which amounts to like 1½% of the total available space. I don’t think that’s a bad trade.

          • Thorned_Rose@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            And not many consider the environmental impact of this either. Sure storage might be cheap (not in my country but I digress) but more space still requires more storage and across thousands of computers and then millions of computers that’s not an insignificant increase. We should be increasing technological efficiency not what were doing at the moment which seems to be just throwing more power and resources at the problems.

    • comfy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Mint took a while to handle flatpak decently in the update manager, and now it’s a nice experience.