• JizzmasterD@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 month ago

    More specifically:

    « Further analysis revealed that while exposure to these pollutants increased the risk of Alzheimer’s disease, the effect seemed stronger for vascular dementia, a type of dementia caused by reduced blood flow to the brain. Around 180,000 people in the UK are thought to be affected by this type of dementia. However, as there were only a small number of studies that examined this difference, the researchers did not class it as statistically significant.«

    • Paragone@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 days ago

      It isn’t the number-of-studies that makes it insignficant or significant:

      it is the number-of-lives-altered-by-the-condition, & the degree-of-alteration, which combine to make it either insignificant or significant.

      I think that if that quote rightly represents what they did, they may be guilty of malpractice “science”.

      _ /\ _

    • Jimbabwe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 month ago

      Garbage take. Also, and I can’t believe I’m saying this unironically, but maybe… think of the children?

      • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 month ago

        OK maybe I didn’t really put that well. What I mean is that the far right oligarchy stooges have leveraged the age related mental decline of large swaths of the population into an electoral stranglehold that makes positive change very hard to achieve.