• tehWrapper@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      2 months ago

      Now most people need massive TVs, but still spend most of the time looking at the small screen on the phone.

      • dickalan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 months ago

        Not me, I will refuse to watch any movie I’ve never seen on a tiny fucking phone screen. I at least have some standards

          • dickalan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Dam. I was only able to afford the 55 inch in 2020 so I’m just rocking the CX. Which did have the hackable firmware to remove all ads from YouTube so I’m not complaining. https://rootmy.tv/

              • dickalan@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                I’m talking about sponsor block for in video ads, but that’s very cool that you can just not agree to that, are you in Europe per chance. I’m also talking about ads before the YouTube video start

                • PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 months ago

                  Nope, I’m in North America. All LG TVs no matter where you are let you do this. Also, I use an Nvidia Shield with smart tube and it has built in sponsor block + ad blocking.

      • CallMeAnAI@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Because unless you’re buying a quality panel the difference between a 45 inch and 65 is usually $150. For something that you need 3 or 4 of (tops, if you have a family or large house) that’ll last 5+ years, the value proposition is high enough to spend the extra money.

    • CallMeAnAI@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Those TVs were in a lot of middle class homes. I think huge is pretty exaggerated. Having a house on the block with those 4 person 40-50 in TV’s was pretty common in a lot of areas IMO.

      • IWW4@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        They weren’t huge at all. They were huge for that day.

        Sure there was 40+ inch tvs if you were willing to shell out 10k plus.

        • CallMeAnAI@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Not even close. We’re talking about $1000-$3000 for a decent high end. You could regularly find used for $400-$500 if you could find a team to lug them out.

        • jaybone@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Not that expensive at all.

          In the 90s you could get a 40in for maybe like $500.