• LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    14 days ago

    The worst part is they didn’t even remove a car lane for this. There’s literally no reason to remove it and the data prove it.

    • QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      14 days ago

      Is it wide enough to ge another lane for cars? Would that actually reduce traffic at all?

      Im not anti-car, but is there any benefit to this? It seems really unlikely

      • DrunkEngineer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        14 days ago

        While it is wide enough, it would be counterproductive for traffic flow to allow vehicular traffic there. The bridge currently has 2 lanes, and the highway beyond is also two lanes – so having a 3rd lane on the bridge would just lead to a zipper-merge situation that would back traffic up.