• Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 days ago

    There is a reason for declining child birth numbers… it has everything to do with more people knowing what they are really getting into.

    • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      7 days ago

      And that everyone’s too damn poor. Babysitter? Not on average wages! No one wants to give up all of their time and money for kids they might not be able to provide for.

      • Pacattack57@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        7 days ago

        There are people giving 100% of their paychecks for childcare and the spouse pays for everything else.

        That is a failure of the US and birth rates won’t improve until that changes.

      • Bluewing@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Being poor has very little to with having children. The poor across the world have more children than the wealthy.

        • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          That doesn’t change the motivations of millions of people in the world. You know, the kind of numbers that can produce a massive dip in data…

    • bunchberry@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      7 days ago

      Well if there was public daycare to take the stress off of parents who couldn’t deal with it then it wouldn’t be as big of an issue.

    • LousyCornMuffins@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      Yeah we had to raise our siblings. Ain’t raising another generation without being paid for it. It’s why we work in education.

    • grindemup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      I don’t really follow your train of thought. People would have been just as aware (if not more, due to the prevalence of multigenerational households) of this in the past as they are now, no?

      • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        In the past people didn’t have access to a device with endless information about how rough it is the raise kids. Instead they had other local parents as a source, and those parents just wanted company in thier misery.

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 days ago

          When I was a kid we used to just get thrown outside along with all the other kids and told not to come back until lunch time.

          We used to get up to all sorts no one cared. At one point someone’s dad took us all to the beach which was about an hour away, we all just got in this strangers car (never met him before) and went to the beach. I don’t remember my parents been even remotely bothered by that when they found out.

          • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            There definitely was a “they are replaceable” attitude back then. Now try to imagine the generations before us, when 13 kids wasn’t that abnormal. And that 13 only counted the ones that survived.