Meta along with Ray-Ban announced new smart glasses and the YT reviewers are praising it.

For me, I don’t find them particularly good and being a Meta product, it will be horrible for privacy. Also people can record others without their knowledge with these, hell no!

  • mrsirsir@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    No. I have no need for this piece of equipment. I don’t want to wear the internet on my face. We asked for hoverboards, holograms, and flying cars.

  • monovergent@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    7 days ago

    No, even if it were open source, I don’t want to normalize an instrument with such potential for privacy violations.

    • Dippy@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      I straight up think people might start making EMPs in response to these. Image your doctor has them, would you feel safe?

      • monovergent@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 days ago

        Haven’t given too much thought to be fair. Taking video on the phone is much more obvious, while someone with camera glasses could make the excuse “I’m not recording!” and you’d be hard-pressed to prove it. For surveillance cameras, you could know where they are and evade, throw a rock, or drape something over them, whereas you’d have to go up and snatch the glasses off the wearer.

        I also wouldn’t be against it if it were used legitimately to help with a disability, or for specific tasks like a HUD with vitals, etc when doing surgery. But for general use, I’m not comfortable.

  • HubertManne@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    its possible. Its hard to say until you start using something. It would make it more like it if it was basically a screen and maybe camera and mic.

  • ABetterTomorrow@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Maybe in 20 years when they’ll be decent and I won’t pay to be you beta tester. Also open source, repairability and privacy is a must

  • Squigglez@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 days ago

    I’ll be the outlier and say that given the perfect circumstances, I would buy Smart Glasses. BUT in no way, shape, or form would I buy META Smart Glasses.

    I work a retail job where I’m staring at shelves for like 80% of my shift, it would be dope as hell to have smart glasses and have a video playing in my vision while I’m working.

    But until there are more of an “open source” type Smart Glasses that aren’t supported by one of the big companies like Meta or Apple, I’ll join the rest of y’all on staying far away from them.

    • EvilBit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      There’s open source but not video capable. The Brilliant Labs Halo glasses coming in November are more of an informational companion with a peripheral-view display rather than a field of view overlay. So it’s not what you’re looking for now, but maybe a generation or two later it’ll meet your needs.

      • Squigglez@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        9 days ago

        That’s still really cool to hear though, definitely looking forward to see where that is in a few years.

      • Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        I wonder if a 3d printable frame could be possible with the lenses and SOC produced separately. Maybe it could be paired with a phone to offload the work.

      • P00ptart@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        9 days ago

        No, none of this. It doesn’t matter if there are “good guys” versions. It shouldn’t be a thing at all because it never goes the good way. They’ll be bought out by Google or apple, and add in ads and tracking software. Or they’ll get big and change core values. Remember when googles motto was like, don’t be evil, or something like that? It definitely isn’t that anymore. There is no scenario where this kind of tech doesn’t turn bad.

        • Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          9 days ago

          A spec that can be 3d printed and hand assembled by the user (with the exception of the lenses) could work well - hard to enshittify that.

    • ethaver@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      8 days ago

      somebody tried to bring them to our psych ward and argue that they needed them because they were prescription (in fairness they were but bruh). it was a shitshow.

  • The Velour Fog @lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    It’ll be a hard no for any smart glasses from Meta or Google.

    However, in the very distant and not quite guaranteed future, I would consider smart glasses (again, NOT by Meta/Google/etc) for accessibility.

    As someone with auditory processing disorder, it would be a game changer if I had the ability to read live closed captions of what someone is saying, while they are talking to me. That would be my only use case.

  • Apeman42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    9 days ago

    In concept, they’re the kind of sci-fi shit I dreamed of as a kid. The reality is that they’ll be locked-down useless trash that you pay out the ass to spy on you.

    • P00ptart@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 days ago

      Just try this epidermal implant. You’ll love it. But, you’ll need the brain implant to activate it…

  • Owl@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    8 days ago

    When some foss alternative releases at an affordable price, yes.

    See y’all in 2077