• Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    If 1 is profitable and 3 aren’t and it’s a matter of geography, that’s a sound business decision.

    What kind of a sane business model would benefit from holding onto (and paying taxes on) property/assets that aren’t profitable? 🧐

    • AspieEgg@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Yeah, that’s kind of my point. 3 of 4 stores in Ottawa aren’t profitable is probably an indicator that Toys R Us (at least in Ottawa) isn’t doing that well.