Porn is everywhere. 80 percent of the web is porn. There’s porn here on Lemmy and on Mastodon. It seems like a whack-a-mole situation .

  • missingno@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    2 months ago

    Conservatives have been labeling anything and everything they don’t like as “porn”. A queer romance novel is “porn”. Two male characters kissing on television is “porn”. Drag queen story time is “porn”. The picture book Heather Has Two Mommies is “porn”. And the thing they’re really most afraid of, educational resources for LGBTQ youth are “porn”.

    So by declaring porn illegal, they now have a pretext to go after everything they call “porn”. Their goal isn’t to remove all porn from the internet, it’s to make it harder for people who need those educational resources to access them. It’s not about porn, it’s about “porn”.

  • notfromhere@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    It’s not a war on drugs porn, it’s a war on personal freedom, OK? Keep that in mind at all times.

    • SaraTonin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 month ago

      It’s more sinister than that - Project 2025 explicitly says that one step in the plan is to classify anything pro-LGBTQ as porn. Make porn illegal, and you’ve just made being LGBTQ or an ally illegal.

      Be openly LGBTQ or say anything supportive in front of someone under the age of 18? You’ve now committed a sexual offense involving a minor.

      And, even before Trump was elected, Republican lawmakers were making the first moves towards mandating the death penalty for sexual offenses involving a minor.

  • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 month ago

    It isn’t a ban so much as being able to legally go after people who evade the ban.

    If you are a reputable company in the right jurisdiction, you can be sued by the state for operating illegally. That is likely enough to get companies to block the state’s IP addresses.

  • yaroto98@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 months ago

    It is impossible. US states make the law, and require the websites to self-block the IP addresses within the state using geo-ip. It’s a flawed solution, but comes with the benefit of being able to sue any semi-large website for not self-blocking and the state receives free fine money. Best part is the state doesn’t actually have to do anything, just pass the law and rake in the publicity.

  • Brkdncr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 months ago
    1. Regulate all traffic sent or received across the state.
    2. Send traffic through a firewall.
    3. decrypt traffic
    4. drop traffic that can’t be decrypted.

    Another easier way:

    1. Regulate ISPs with new state laws.
    2. require they block porn.
    3. Sue ISPs that violate the law.
    • FartsWithAnAccent@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      decrypt traffic

      drop traffic that can’t be decrypted.

      This would be an absolute fucking disaster for myriad reasons both technical and practical. Any politician who earnestly suggests it as any sort of solution 100% has no idea what they’re talking about and should not be taken seriously.

      Yes, politicians talk about trying to do something like that, but the reality is that it would destroy security for businesses, institutions, and even the government itself. Encryption and VPNs are crucial to just about any modern business of even moderate size.

      • Brkdncr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Many US companies have businesses inside China, it’s bad but it’s not impossible. I wouldn’t be surprised if a state actually doesn’t.

        • FartsWithAnAccent@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          Those also companies use VPNs when they transmit, bring burner devices, and take other countermeasures to try protect their data from theft.

          Additionally, there are plenty of people who are citizens there and still get around their firewall.

          Actually getting rid of encryption or making it ineffective would be a disaster: IP theft, identity theft, and all sorts of other problems would greatly intensify without it.

          • Brkdncr@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            I agree, but I was answering OPs question on how it would be done and an example of similar tech already in use at scale.

  • neidu3@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    I really hope to see official declare a “war on porn”. Considering how terrorism and drugs won the previous two, I’m sure it’s gonna be a fun watch from the sidelines.

    • burntbacon@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      I don’t know if terrorism or drugs have “won.” The government is able to use them to fuck up the lives of people who they don’t like… see venezuela and what they’re trying to do with antifa.