Proton is considering recycling old email addresses that still receive misdirected mail and appear in breach data, raising serious privacy concerns.

  • scholar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    I’m sure proton would clear the inboxes before making the addresses available, so there’s no risk of seeing legitimate mail meant for someone else.

    In terms of misdirected mail there are two types:

    1. Mistyped email addresses
      where a user has made a typo when entering their email somewhere
    2. Randomly typed email addresses
      where a user entered a random email when signing up for a service they didn’t care about

    Both of these can affect any existing email address (so proton’s plans make no difference), and only type 1 could be a privacy risk.

    Email addresses aren’t secret, nor are they personally identifiable (unless they contain your name or are linked with other personal information) so I don’t see a problem here.

    • Cris@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      7 days ago

      Wouldn’t the security risk be that if someone thinks the old user is still using that email address, or forgets, they may mistakenly send sensitive into to the person who now has the address…?

      Am I missing something?

      • scholar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        7 days ago

        The previous owners were bots and the accounts were deactivated by proton shortly after registry

      • popcar2@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        7 days ago

        Have you read the article? These are old bot accounts that have been disabled for almost a decade. It’s in the very first line.

        • Cris@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          Nope, I didn’t, thank you for correcting me :)

          I’m a lot better about reading the article than I used to be but sometimes I still don’t and just wanna chat about stuff with folks, and in this case that’s my bad