Proton is considering recycling old email addresses that still receive misdirected mail and appear in breach data, raising serious privacy concerns.

  • popcar2@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    What a stupid, nothingburger article.

    The company is considering releasing millions of old email addresses that were originally created by bots in its early years. These accounts were disabled almost immediately, but the addresses lived on. […] The problem is that many of these addresses are extremely common.

    So what? The author rambles about the horrors of getting emails from people who have accidentally written in a generic email handle. It’s not a huge deal. Tons of people using other email services like Outlook and Gmail also have generic usernames, it’s a user’s choice on whether to get one or not. These are old bot accounts that have been disabled for almost a decade, so it’s not like somebody would send emails assuming it was the old person using the handle.

    Proton says it wants community feedback, which is good, but the fact that it is even considering such a reckless idea makes me question the company’s judgment.

    “I’m mad that the company is surveying their community”, great argument.

    • Jason2357@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      I have never heard of an email provider that will hold your address for you forever, paid or free. This post makes no sense.

  • bitcrafter@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    5 days ago

    I am confused about how this differs significantly from someone mistyping their e-mail address so that they end up instead typing in someone else’s active e-mail address, because in both cases e-mails get sent to the wrong person.

  • atopi@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    I usually dont like to criticize art since there was real effort put by real people in it, but that doesnt apply to AI generated images

    This may be the most confusing, uninformative, boring image for an article i have ever seen

  • scholar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    I’m sure proton would clear the inboxes before making the addresses available, so there’s no risk of seeing legitimate mail meant for someone else.

    In terms of misdirected mail there are two types:

    1. Mistyped email addresses
      where a user has made a typo when entering their email somewhere
    2. Randomly typed email addresses
      where a user entered a random email when signing up for a service they didn’t care about

    Both of these can affect any existing email address (so proton’s plans make no difference), and only type 1 could be a privacy risk.

    Email addresses aren’t secret, nor are they personally identifiable (unless they contain your name or are linked with other personal information) so I don’t see a problem here.

    • Cris@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      5 days ago

      Wouldn’t the security risk be that if someone thinks the old user is still using that email address, or forgets, they may mistakenly send sensitive into to the person who now has the address…?

      Am I missing something?

      • scholar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        5 days ago

        The previous owners were bots and the accounts were deactivated by proton shortly after registry

      • popcar2@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        5 days ago

        Have you read the article? These are old bot accounts that have been disabled for almost a decade. It’s in the very first line.

        • Cris@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          Nope, I didn’t, thank you for correcting me :)

          I’m a lot better about reading the article than I used to be but sometimes I still don’t and just wanna chat about stuff with folks, and in this case that’s my bad

  • katy ✨@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    5 days ago

    can’t believe a company run by andy yen, who is buddy buddy with the us government, would do something like this.